HRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRT HRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRT HRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRT HRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRT HRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRT HRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRT HRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRT HRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRT HRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRT HRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRT HRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRT HRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRT HRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRT HRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRTHRT Sauber close second
Aesthetically its the Williams for me, although that might be just down to the fact they've spent so much time crashed or going slowly I've been able to appreciate it more!
The unusual shape of the side pods on the Mclaren does it for me. The colour scheme is also nice. The Red bull is also a bit of a looker if im honest. Its just looks so sleek and fast, like it always seems to be.
Mercedes WO2 looks close to the same mindset as of the 50's cars in both F1 and Le mans. When I look at it I can only think of Fangio and Stirling Moss.
I try to avoid participating in subjective debate but just for a change, I thought "why not?". How does one separate 'best looking' from best car? - I confess that I don't really know. Do we take account of liveries and sponsorship? Do we take account of a car's ultimate speed or ignore it altogether? Ignoring performance, Hispania have produced a great looking car; but I find it difficult to do this. For that reason, I declare that performance does matter to me and that McLaren have produced the best looking car of the front runners.
the McLaren for me, the first time i looked at it I thought 'there's the winner'. I like a bit of Garish colour though, and that seems to be missing from the grid (I loved the benetton b186, and the Marlboro McLaren design is why i'm more of a McLaren fan), so I'll go for the Lotus, it looks nice and, for me, has the 'sportiest' colour-scheme.
