**** OFF you bitter ****, you will never see as good a game of football involving the ****e you support.
Basically. Though that is the way City always play against us. City fans can take some positives from the game as well.
I think the positive is that we weren't cut open and we didn't look worried defensively. We made 2 mistakes and unfortunately got punished (that's what good teams/players do). I'd be more worried if we played that way and then City just walked through us twice and scored 2 goals. Let's remember we were probably missing 2 of our normal back 4 in Enrique & Agger.
The **** are you on about you ****ing smack rat. Read it again, its praise for Liverpool as they made City look bad in parts but seemed to cause yourselves problems. Thats what the BBC text implies. No need to apologise dollface.
Bring on Arsenal, I say, if we play like this, we will smear them all over the grass, and their pussy footing lame attack.
Excellent performance, great free kick, good point. Arsenal looks like a fascinating game after the two matches played today
As I said, **** OFF you Cannal Street rim boy, you didn't see it, Citeh played football your shower of ****e could only dream of, and we were better again.
I agree with everything other than that it is a rare mistake by Skrtel - he does this too often. He'll have a smashing game, but one mistake will lead to a goal. He really needs to get some more composure when under pressure, other than that he played well.
**** me you inbred spasticated ******.... Next time I will remember to tell you how ****ing **** you are because whenb morons like you and that backwards **** noblex jump on my comment thats quite clearly praising liverpool whats the point. Your mods would do well to get shut of idiots like you and the simple fact is most of your fellow LFC fans agree. To the none special needs scousers, congratulations on a good result though I think you are more disappointed at the dropping of 2 points
Just watching the Skrtel mistake again and I think it was also a problem as he was having to play in the left hand side. I know it sounds silly, but you watch and he has to turn outwards so he back is to goal and he's on his first foot to pass back where as if that was Agger or Skrtel was on the right hand side, he could have found the forward pass more easily, or looked up or he was already facing the right way to use his strong foot and would have seen Tevez there.
Really sound. Good game against the champions (we should have won but top marks to City). Good on the eye too. Only gripe is that I'd play Carroll - if Borini wants that shirt he should earn it, and i think Andy looks far, far more keen atm.
Rodger's is clearly doing a lot to make Anfield a fortress. We have another 2 home games in a row now V Hearts and Arsenal.
Borini is not playing a role that Carroll would do. Borini was playing wide a lot of the time. I think Borini could be more of a Kuyt type. Give him time.
True. But to be fair we made them look poor, they simply couldn't handle our constant pressing. Plus our 3 man midfield absolutely bossed their 4 man midfield. 2 poor goals conceded = 2 points lost, not 1 point gained. Having said that after West Brom I would have taken 2-2 at the start of play.
See Bazray and noblex, this is how normal people reply. Learn from this if you have the mental capacity for it Yeh sounds like 2 points lost but as you say, a draw with city is something you would take in most cases.
