I would challenge anyone to come up with one single point in favour of keeping the royals that can't be disproved. But more importantly I'm going to walk the dog, which thankfully isn't a Corgie or a King Charles Spaniel.
We could have Evra's head on stamps. but they wouldn't stick because people would spit on the wrong side..... I'll get my coat.
If the British people are paying foe the royalty they should have the right to see them naked... Kate? You're next... start stripping.
Leaches and bloody parasites!! And UIR,I would suggest that £40m per year is a very,very conservative estimate.
Like **** I am. Im just not a moron and dont go crying about Jeremy Kyle style rats and people who actually bring something worthwhile to this country.
Hmmm.... Royals who have limited if any power or a President who could end up being any ****ing nutjob with all the power? They are a novelty, they dont do anything bar bring people to the country and get them to spend their cash on pointless tat. I bet some of you believe she still rules over half the world and the US is just an english county that we let them think they run
Most of the old money elites amassed their wealth in some dodgy ways but last time I checked it was 2012 and I dont see Liz starting many wars recently. Like I said, they are a novelty that the Japanese and Americans love to come and see. Plus shes good for a day off here and there
It's not just that the old bag and her family of hangers on get paid, the cheeky bastards use Air Force owned planes and helicopters and Navy owned ships like taxis, during the Falkland/Malvinas war she even refused to 'allow' the state owned Royal Yacht to be used as a hospital ship.
You mean like a President would? She also gets a bunch of our soldiers to do parades and stand like statues. Cheeky ****ing bitch if you as me Refusing to allow the yacht to be used as a hospital ship is a bit ****ish though. If we had no monarchy would we have a President?
