Chapper what exactly is wrong with asking a question? As I said it's an honest question, and the fact that you will not give an answer is neither here nor there, but you see a trap or a set up. Don't answer, that's your right but please don't accuse me of something I have not done just because you suspect I have an ulterior motive.
Some Rangers posters are banned from the Celtic forum. Quite simple really if you think about it. No opinion on the matter or do you see a plot too?
As Mindy says, it's a bit of a myth that there are no hard and fast rules in play for liquidation, the SFA rules clearly deal with Liquidation events. The SFA always leave themselves open to criticism, arbiters of the game always do, it's in the very nature of the rulebook that people (Like Celtic did) will find flaws in it. Besides that I agree with most of the rest of what you said, the SFA do come across as bumbling amateurs and they did have self interest when it came to money from TV rights, but is that really kicking Rangers while they are down or making Rangers pay the price for going into Liquidation? Maybe it is a punishment even though it's not in the rule books.
You're clearly fishing and NO ONE has bitten, it's sad, pathetic, tragic and hilarious! Get it up ye!...
As soon as Rangers went into administration, the SPL board (and SFA) should have got together and decided on the rules. Along the lines of : In administration - minus 10 points. Come out before end of the season, all good - start next season on 0. In administration - minus 10 points. Not out before end of the season/start of next season - start next season on -10 and signing ban in place for season. In administration - minus 10 points. Not out before end of the season and are liquidated. Newco - start next season in SPL -25 points. Other sanctions may have to be agreed by all member clubs. But they ****ed about/hummed n hawed/danced around the issues and put pressure on clubs to make decisions - Reagan and Doncaster are paid six figure salaries and shirked making decisions - they should sacked.
Is this you NOT feeding the Trolls? Jeezo, I would not like to see you if you were feeding them, there would be about 100 replies by now.
The SFA and SPL have been 2 faced greedy bastards...yet they have not kicked "us when we are down" They tried to keep them in SPL and failed They tried to force them in SFL1 and failed They allowed them in SFL3 even though they have no right to be there...yet at a price, let's not forget the greed... If anything they have been rewarded for calling themselves "The Rangers"...if only Spartans thought of that first So even after all that was done to help them...why do their fans and "owner" have such a hatred for Stuart Reagan? His Timmy name?
fill your boots timothy, if the shoe was on the other foot i have no doubt ra sellick would get it just as bad from ourselves, we will be back stronger and better so do your worst until then, and btw if it wasn't for wee Fergus you lot wiz 24hours from the same fate lucky for you the Croy Cowboy rode into town, unlucky for us the Whyte Knight was a piece of ****e!!!
I think this whole thing of kicking rangers when they are down is an act of disgusting , cowardly hypocrisy by many people. Any right-minded principled person - like my good self - should be kicking them at every opportunity whether they be up , down, sideways , over or across.
Are you completely ******ed chapper? Wtf are you rambling on about? In fact don't answer that (as you promised) because I don't care what you think. Your responses make it clear that you think the world is against Rangers.
You've obviously missed the script written by EDGE and Nev and repeated ad naseum day-after-day-after-day-after-day-after-day.....; Dev is beelin'.
What's it like? Only Squiggy responded in the spirit in which the question was asked. A siege mentality is all well and good but unless i've missed my mark some people are too scared to respond in case this is a carefully laid trap or a wind up. Some have even come and said it is a trap. Talk about paranoid.
