Just wanted to get everyones thoughts on this. Personally i'm gutted i've always been a big admirer of him and always thought we'd eventually get him. Can't see the point in him going to City they'll waste his career away like they're doing with milner, johnson and richards; all three perform well every time their picked for city but yet they're still hardly ever in the team. Also do you think this will mean the end of any chance we had of getting Baines ? I can't see Moyes allowing two of his top players to leave baring in mind he's also lost Cahill as well
Over rated and overpriced.Never really got excited when we were linked with him for the prices that were quoted.Good luck to him.
Done nothing in his career, not progressed at all as a player either. Played no more than 17 games a season either I dont think but not sure on that one before any backwards ****tard points out if its wrong City dont need him and its the worst move he could make for his career. <<< thats all you can do, when will these young footballers learn?
Rodwell was a very promising youngster but has never really developed beyond that over the past few years, nowadays he just seems to be a decent hard working English midfielder, nothing more.
One of several billion playing today His time has gone to become a United player, he wasnt quite ready back then and hes never really shown us any reason to pursue our interest further. He will be back at Everton in 2 years aswell
Why would you pluck 17 out of the air if you don't know? He played 36 in all competitions once. Backwards ****tard sounds about right.
Yeh maybe its league games and it wasnt plucked out of thin air it was taken from elsewhere. Not being an everton fan I dont tend to follow the career of Jack Rodwell. ****tard applies to you though, I mean I couldnt make it any more obvious they may not be correct figures and even said only a ****tard would question it considering that. Well done sir, very well done
And my point was why put down 17 when you know it's almost definitely incorrect. If you're reading stories about Jack Rodwell on the internet then it wouldn't take an age to check on Wikipedia or some other easily accessible place. If someone like you, creating 'sack watch' threads, is calling me a '****tard' then I'm probably not doing too much wrong.
He has 87 appearances since 2007 Looks like its average per season. Your last comment doesnt deserve a response. You are just another moron who I make look a fool daily.
The irony being you're marginally more intelligent than Matth. He's had three proper seasons, given he was barely a child in 07/08 and made a couple of token sub appearances, so to say he's averaged 17 games a season isn't right either.
I think we are done here. Considering the ****e you post on here usually I as always cant help but laugh. Waddle off back to whichever nomark team you support
Some serious pricks on this site. If anyone has a problem with me dealing with these no marks as I do, PM me. I understand it can get annoying to some United fans. I think some of them think you agree with them, poor deluded morons Some ****ing gimp was telling me and swarbs that Forest are a bigger club than United last night. hahahahaha. This is the level of people we are dealing with
My posts are always reasonably well thought out and I don't need to resort to pointless wumming. My 'nomark' team arguably cost you the title, so perhaps we are indeed done here
How come we are wasting the careers of Richards Milner and Johnson 29,26. & 26 PL appearances respectively last year when the PL top scorer of the year before Berbatov only played 12 times and Nani played the same as Richards and Ashley young played 25 Are man utd wasting their careers or is it one rule for you?
Interesting choice for a player who's arguably not even first choice at Everton, particularly given that Mancini has said he needs to improve if he's going to get games for City. I'd have thought he would've stayed at Everton a few more years, at least until he's developed enough to have a decent shout at the City first team. He is risking being another SWP imo, but then the extra money he will get at City probably made the offer hard to turn down. Also interesting choice for City imo - CM is not really an area they are particularly short on cover, unless De Jong is on his way out. Still, probably not a bad signing - always helps to bring in some young lads to keep the older ones on their toes, provided he will actually get the chance to play if the established players are struggling a bit.
Just what I was thinking. In fact, they rolled over home and away against us, and against City. Six points apiece. The only way they could have played less of a role in the title race would've been if they'd just stayed at home!
