Originally Posted by AmsterdamRoger All i read are your insults to my friends i wont stand for it so have some back its what you came here for, not your pretext of football, and as far as your replies go you make a terrific amount of assumptions to get your case across here, you remind me of that turd i **** next to a badger, oh wait a minuet sussed, I pity your mother, having to buy the last seed in the sperm bank, and look what happened Friends? Jesus... I pity you if you truly think that these people are friends. You can defend your friends, but I can't defend myself? Sounds like a Stevie G. defence... Pretense of football? You must be joking. I'm the only one, out of the whole Tyne-Wear forums, who doesn't even dislike the other side . I support the North East, but have banter with the lads on here from time to time because I am a Newcastle ST holder... Once again, if you could read you'd have got this ages ago, you're just making yourself a public laughing stock with every further post now!
All I can make out from that is you pointlessly abusing someone on your misguided belief that they are pretending to want to talk footy, when in actual fact the whole point of his post was to compliment each other's clubs. You, of course, couldn;t find it in your heart to say anything good about the "skunks", so resorted to horrific abuse.
I have read the article concerned, in fact I have commented on it and you have replied to my comment (no amount of faces will ever be enough for your comment, so I'll leave it at 3).
Well I do...but first I see him being insulted for posting a well-meaning article, he then defends himself, and you jump in to defend your bum chums.
thats exactly your trouble, because hes a mag you cant see a wind up, be it a clever one, but a wind up never the less purely designed to cause controversy, so he can use his insults, ps before you reply count the positive replies as against the negatives where we saw through his wum.
Your entitled to your opinion of course, but if you read the link he posted you would see it's not a wind up at all! His negative replies were purely self defence, he didn't say anything to anyone who didn't first abuse him.
Ok, without abuse or sarcasm, answer this question. He posted a thread on which he complimented Sunderland, and encouraged others to do the same. He then came onto the Sunderland forum to let you know about the thread, hoping you would do the same for Newcastle. How is that a wind up?
I did my time in the paras anyone attacks your friends you wade in, he verbally attacked my friends, response reciprocated. if he wanted a proper debate he would be more tolerant and try and win over the doubters, instead he went all guns blazing with nasty insults, and never referred to the op again, apart from when he again turned nice again, to get comm to close the thread so he could have the last word, domination complex or what, There are none so blind as those who cannot see
Firstly... Paras, as bonded as they are, are taught to assess the situation before "you wade in"... If you had done that, it would have been different outcome tonight. Secondly, I essentially just reciprocated what was being thrown at me, so how are you superior, then? Anyway look, you "win". I'll never post on this board again. Simple. Everyone's happy. Tonight/yesterday hasn't changed my attitude to or my opinion of Sunderland as a great city, or the football team you support, nor any of my mackem mates. I am very sorry if you genuinely were offended by what was pretty tame responses by my usual cutting standard. That is never the true intention. I simply retaliated because if someone is a certain way with me, that's clearly how they want to be dealt with and I do so accordingly... And I'm immature You can wish me dead all you want, as you have done many times now. I wish the opposite for you, a long and happy life with much success. Have fun.
Translated as "I'm a chav, my scummy mate starts a fight on some innocent fella standing there, I'm gonna jump in with the lads and give him a doing as well"
We saw through his wum attempt end of. Yesterday was maelstrom of post and counter post started by a Newcastle fan starting a thread on a Sunderland board - always a dangerous mix - and is quite different to a Newcastle fan contributing to an existing debate. Now, in the cold light of day and with some reflection I would not wish Newcastle fans to stop making contributions to debate - all I would hope is that they realise that when the wum & troll they interrupt and stifle the debate on the article topic, it is a cynical act imho.
Hahaha the pussies whining about someone saying "Drop dead!" Something said numerous times in real life in heated arguments even among friends. They must read every line of my fellow Mackem's posts to find something they can try to pull them up on, ****ing sad sacks! The first one up was the imbecile in my (Unedited.) signature. Hahahaha After what he said in there, I wonder if he actually sees the irony in whining like a pussy?
yes they can give but not take it appears, however I over stepped the mark yesterday and contributed to the shambles.
Mate we have two choices on here, if we don't like what tha mags are saying, say nowt and they think they have won, or give as good as they dish out,in which case they take what you say, put their own adaption on to it, then try and take the moral high ground as if its our fault, whilst there are 5 good mags who come on here, this **** isn't one of them. not once did he come back with a reason as to why abuse, if someone took the mick why did he not reason his argument out, instead of reverting to abuse,and inevitable consequences resulting in a slanging match, typical trait of a lesser skunk. It was the abuse to fellow mackems that caused me to respond, and i will do it again without hesitation then next time one of these olimpdicks fail in their medal attempts at wumming.
