The fact that I'm talking about football and the issues regarding our 2 clubs and you lot are talking about me says it all. Not a ****ing leg to stand on. I bet most of you are pimply bastards sitting in a bedroom in Surrey anyway
Do you ever say something that makes any sense? We are in great shape. The first XI; Vorm (excellent Rodgers signing) Rangel (Martinez) Chico (Laudrup) Williams (Martinez) Taylor (the chairman pushed it through when we were manager less following Sousa's departure) Britton (Flynn) De Guzman (Laudrup) Michu (Laudrup) Dyer (Martinez) Sinclair (Rodgers) Graham (Rodgers) ....and that's assuming Allen (Flynn and Martinez brought through the youth system) is going. Do you get the picture? In that team guess who's position is most under threat? Sinclair and Graham, both Rodgers signings....it's common knowledge we are looking at left wingers and strikers. If Liverpool hurry the **** up and pay the £15 million we can get on with signing a couple of forwards and improving our defensive cover. If Allen stays fine. De Guzman can play on either wing. The point is, the media have given Rodgers far too much credit (not surprising as we were largely ignored by the media and many couldn't even get our players' names right at the start of last season). His strengths were man management and, at Championship level, contacts. He made some good signings and some bad signings for us. Let's see how he does signing players of the class a club with the budget size of Liverpool require. So far it's not looking good is it?
What the **** does Wigger mean anyway? That you want to be black? As so many of you dipshits are fond of saying, epic fail.
Stop crying :L Serious question - Do you have issues or something? Edit - Btw, don't ask a question then answer it yourself
Rodgers should stop using Swansea's tactics last season as his yardstick, Even in our worst season for 40yrs we managed to reach two cup finals. Oh, and we finished higher than Swansea, scored more goals, conceded less, had more wins/less defeats, there were many games last season when we out played the opposition and our finishing cost us. So last season Kenny's tactics were better than Rodgers? Eye candy football is all well and good, but if we finish as low as Swansea did last year it would be even more embarrassing than last year. Over to you terrorwit.
It's looking very good surely? He has inherited a good team and you are saying his strengths will get them to where they should be like he did with you lot? I can't help but think you have contradicted yourself.
I agree. You should never have got rid of Kenny I mean that actually, said so at the time on the Swansea board. Feel it was about to click for you. Now you've got upheaval and revolution, and no doubt Rodgers will sell players that Kenny would have kept at a loss. Our styles are just different. We had to play our way to rise on much less resources than our rivals (we were even among the bottom 5 in the championship in terms of wages). It made us unique in the English game and ensured that the players we got in to play it were unlikely to fit in anywhere else....so we had more chance of keeping them. All the way up the press and pundits have been saying that we're too small, don't score enough, tippy tappy, not strong in the tackle etc. Players got a chance here who wouldn't have got a chance anywhere else. Doesn't mean it's right for Liverpool. You nearly won 2 cups last season and with a bit more luck would have finished much higher up the table. Now you're into the unknown.
I can't help but think he's heading for a nervous breakdown at this rate he's a tense fellow isn't he...must be the welsh water...LG gets like that sometimes
