because we were sick fed up of the football under mowbray (im fairly sure that was the season you managed to "beat" us) well no - that would only apply if rangers regularly sold out their ground - you cant add a proportionate amount if you dont sell out - that is basic maths
Mowbray was only there about 9 months, it's been in the late 40,000's ever since, despite "the thunder"
I thought you weren't engaging in any conversations with me these days? Convenient that you stopped where you did, why not go a year further back? Rangers 47564 Celtic 45582 Ah, that's why... Also, regarding the "when rangers were getting 3iar" comment, when Celtic were getting 3iar ibrox was still averaging 49,000 for the season which also included the disastrous le guen era. Yet parkheed dropped 10-15k when rangers were doing it. What were you saying about loyalty?...
Did I post those stats just for you? Did I quote/reply you? Did I address my point to you? Did I request/demand a response from you? I don't think I did
I'll entertain you once you've explained yourself on the yank tim thread despite being prompted twice...
????????? this makes no sense - i already said that one year in the 10 rangers managed a better average 1 year out of 10 so 9 times out of 10 celtic supporters are more loyal - would that be fairer this is not an argument you can win chappers....
Yes but having more once in the last 6yrs is still an achievement considering the extra 10k plus gtfitw. What about your loyalty point, which is what I was getting at til dev piped up. 10-15k empty seats during gers 3iar with Mowbray but we had a Celtic 3iar with le guen which is a very similar if not worse scenario and yet our attendance was probably a peak at 49k odd. Well if you're being serious all i can do is quote armin van heldon... Why fanx, for the record, you're my favourite Internet tim.
