Oh and by the way if you ignore Lampard's 2 penalties like you said, he's still got the best %. Why don't you just sign him and stick him up front as surely this % alone means he will score you loads of goals
You really are one of the numbest **** stains on this board arent you? Lampard has scored 15 to 20 goals a season regularly for 10 years. Of course he would be a massive influence with that sort of goal return for ANYONE. Chelsea strikers individually dont score loads of goals every year (even Drogba who has a record of 16, 16, 33, 15, 14, 37, 13 & 13 in his career at Stamford Bridge) but they can score from all over the park. These players are invaluable and reduce the pressure on the strikers. Drogba only scored 1 more goal than Fletcher for each of the past 2 seasons, playing 46 games for his 13 the previous season and Chelsea must create 15 or 20 chances per game. We do need more goals from our midfield and I think a player will be sought to do that but Fletcher wading in with 15 next season would be good value - btw Chelsea paid £24m for Drogbaand £200k per week, so £12m and less than a quarter of those wages isnt exactly extortionate is it?
What the **** are you banging on about now you knob? The point I was making is you've posted a nonsense graph purely because it shows Fletcher in a good light and are assuming that because he had 10 'clear cut chances' (what a load of bollocks) last season and scored 7 of them that he's going to be a great striker for you. You said to ignore Lampard because his stats will be flawed because he takes penalties which is nonsense because even if you take his penalties out of it he is still top % wise in your silly little graph, which proves that the whole thing is a load of nonsense and made the point that if you're going to judge a player based on this ****e you might aswell sign Frank Lampard and stick him up front as he is the best striker in the league according to this load of cock. .
