well i dont believe you Romans Advisor..and i dont think your advice is much to go by..so go and fuk yourself if you want to dish out the insults..mate
can i just say that im no fan of twitter, and certainly not of any of your players, but for crying out loud charging him for laughing at somebody elses comments? typical knee-jerk reaction of the stuffed suits who run the game. im behind you this time rio
Rio should be charged! By saying Ashley is a Choc Ice implies that his support of Terry was in some way showing 'whiteness' (whatever the **** that is.) He stood by him as a team mate and nothing to do with skin colour. I take offence to Ashleys cupport being deemed as being in some way white. Most of the country thought (inlcuding myself) that Terrys actions and words were disgusting, but Rio bringing colour into it is just as bad..... If a choc Ice Is a black man who acts in a white way, then surely any black man who adopts British culture by playing, football, cricket etc etc is guilty of being a choc ice.....Of course this is not true, as each and every person on the planet has the right to act and do as they see fit.......And if others dont like it they should keep their opinions to them selves....Rio acted like an arrogant muppet and deserves everything he gets.... I also hope Terry gets a lengthy ban aswell, as should anyone who makes race an issue in sport or any other aspect of life.
Notice the Daily Mail will not allow comments on the story for "Legal reasons". A somewhat different stance from the Suarez affair, as I'm sure will be the positions adopted by Samuel, Ladyboy, Lawton and Des Kelly.
I am of ethnic origin and find your choice of legend misjudged And why can't a black man be white on the inside? What's wrong with being white? Do all black men have to be black on the inside?
No, but it did "call into question the integrity of the match referee", which also violates the FA's rules and also incurs a ban if the rules are enforced. Hence I wonder if they will be consistent...
I donât give a **** that you don't believe me. Personally after reading your post regarding this issue I have serious doubts that you have even a sun tan and this is nothing more than another poorly veiled Terry bash.
Im thinking of setting up a media consultancy company whereby I get paid to go to businesses/celebrities/sportspeople and lecture a bunch of cretins on how not to post stupid, offensive or racist things on social media sites. Obviously there's a market for it.
"Obviously there's a market for it." There's a packet to be made in all this 'anti-racism' racket, that's for sure. Even those HR policy-wonks in the workplace (who are incapable of actually doing any productive work in any other department) get a free ride and eye-watering pay packets for their 'diversity' seminars.
I find this attack on Doreen Laurence very disturbing. Why drag this courageous woman into this?you are a scumbag of the highest order. Whenever there s a thread on this issue you jump in and take the opportunity to vent your hatred you f**king vile bastrad. Your hatred of black people is evident even though you from time to time say you admire John Barnes. Just have the balls to admit it..
"I find this attack on Doreen Laurence very disturbing. Why drag this courageous woman into this?you are a scumbag of the highest order. Whenever there s a thread on this issue you jump in and take the opportunity to vent your hatred you f**king vile bastrad. Your hatred of black people is evident even though you from time to time say you admire John Barnes. Just have the balls to admit it.. " And I've told you on several occasions to back up these nonsensical racist slurs with any facts. I 'attack' Doreen Lawrence, as I've explained before, because she contaminated a brave, inspiring, determined and passionate campaign to bring the hideous killers of her innocent son with a decision to support a millionaire, arrogant, foul-mouthed yob in his argument with another foul-mouthed, ignorant, millionaire yob. And I have no fooking hatred of black people, per se, at all. I do have a hatred ofd perverse chanchers with a sense of fooking entitlement and a huge chip on their shoulder (like Evra and Rio) using an essential and important societal movement like equal opportunities to act like cretinous yobs and then squeal like outraged old-maids when they get an equally cretinous, yobbish reponse. And yes, for the record, as a quarter Chinese myself I, and many other people I assure you, are frequently bemused by the hijacking and stranglehold on all issues of race-relations by self-purpetuating, self-appointed, self-righteous cabals of black groups unilaterally deciding what is and isn't racism. You, on the otherhand, have no qualms about stereotyping and ignorantly lambasting Suarez at every opportunity you can - is it because the greasy dago isn't black? My admiration of many black people extends further than John Barnes, btw. Michael Johnson is an intelligent, self-assured and confident man, as is my daughter's godfather, several of my workmates and also was the late tail-gunner of my dad's bomber in WWII. I'm not patronising enough though to pretend that every black man is a paragon of virtue who always tells the truth and never has a bad thought in their head. I leave that to you and the FA 'independent' panel.
If ever someone epitomised the " I'm not racist but ... " crowd, it's gotta be this one quarter chinaman To the Chelsea fans clinging to the word " Justice ". JT is as innocent as that other well known millionaire thug who, with a gang of mates ( who admitted guilt ), went upto a bloke sitting on his own, and punched him 3 times, in self defence
Just listen to yourself you self serving pretentious scumbag. Have you ever been in Doreen Lawrence's position? I wish like many right thinking people that you are not ever nor any of us. Have you thought of what she has been through before you viciously mock her? To drag her into this spat tells us more about you than this admirable woman. If we had a penny for the number of times that you have used 'I am a quarter chinaman' in an argument, we would all be able to afford a ticket to the 2012 closing ceremony now on sale. So what? Does the combination of 75% white DNA with 25% Chinese DNA make someone more enlightened or more able to express their views on racial issues You are a one man campaign. Give it up because no one with a brain will ever be convinced by your pretend sincerity. Your unexpressed real views surface from time to time even you do your best to cloak them under a veneer of objectivity. When you are in a hole, stop digging. You pretend you target only some blacks but in reality you have real racial issues to sort out. How many times do the vilest racists say " my best friends are black" so the supporting cast of black people you trot out does not convince.
"Just listen to yourself you self serving pretentious scumbag. Have you ever been in Doreen Lawrence's position? I wish like many right thinking people that you are not ever nor any of us. Have you thought of what she has been through before you viciously mock her? To drag her into this spat tells us more about you than this admirable woman." She dragged herself into it. What on Earth was going through her head when she decided to support Anton Ferdinand? All blacks must stick togethher regardless? isn't that the most racist of thoughts, that a person is right or wrong depending upon their colour? And for your information my dna is 100% human. The cells that form my body are not one quarter Chinese, three-eighths Scots, one quarter Irish and one eighth German (! maybe that's the Nazi bit you're stereotypically looking for). Read through your argument - YOU are the one who catagorises people in groupings, MY criticsims of certain black people are as individuals. And yes, I have no problem saying I have black friend, and that there are some black people I don't get on with. I certainly have more black freinds than Chinese, and less black people I don't get on with than white. As predictable is the "i have black friends" defence of a racist is also the Guardian, white-hypocrite-liberal response of "That's what all racist say".: normally because people like you have no real association with black people and don't know that they're as flawed, beautiful, contradictory and infuriating as the rest of us. And, in a darwinian stance, just like any other sector of community, if given special privileges and rights at the expense of the rest of society, some individuals will ruthlessly exploit them. that's in human dna, not specific to any race, and to argue otherwise is patronising, racist poppycock. Anyway, you've had months to back up these fatuous claims of racism - I say again, give me the quote in my post history where I have been racist. And if the best argument you've got is Doreen lawrence, can I reply that YOU are being racist defending the woman for an attrocious lack of judgement based soley upon the colour of a person's skin.
