Lol, good point! But the point still stands - all your Belgian players are either bench warmers and / or unsettled. They're hardly going to have given Hazard a ringing endorsement of life at Chelsea...
Well, you could say that, but Courtois starts for Atletico and I think was statistically one of the top 5 keepers in La Liga and has previously stated that he will wait until Cech's time is up, De Bruyne has only just arrived, but yeah Lukaku may have not been the best selling point but I'm sure he'll be a good player in the future, and we can just blame AVB. Also, Joe Cole put a good word in.
I am sure that I read somewhere that Chelski/Chavski is actually inaccurate because 'ski' is more a Polish thing than a Russian thing.
All the chit chat on the United board is centered on Liverpool, City and Chelsea. This is a clear sign that United fans have unconsciously identified these clubs as clear threats. Smell the fear.
Well City are currently the champs so ovcourse they are a "threat" and Chelsea have improved so far this transfer window so yes they are a threat infact i have already said this, the title will be between Manchester United, City and Chelsea if they can play together. Why you included Liverpool is beyond me though maybe they will be a threat to Everton for the top 7 but i'm not so sure.
Russian certainly does use the -Ski ( ски in Cyrulic script )ending on masculine words ( skaya would be a femanine ending ). It must be hard being dumb, but do keep up
Someone has to keep you Cockney ****ers in you place, if you dont like it, **** off back to your own board.
You really are a waste of air!! A Russian could use Smith if he wants, but it aint Russian. Ski is a Polish suffix. Back to Google school piss flap!