that's what I'm getting at, the realism of it. I mean a white woman had a black kid ffs. what are the odds? they are conveying to the world that this is the norm in Britain. Maybe it is in London **** knows? The black guy playing cricket was hilarious.
you must not watch much cricket either, most of the people who play it globally are at least a bit brown.
Why were the rag heids not properly represented? Theres more of them than darkies in Britain. One of them could have been shown playing cricket in the 1800's
There was definitely more whites than blacks ratio-wise than in east london where the olympics are held
Or even watched the Olympics? Ever heard of Daley Thompson, Kelly Holmes, or Christine Uhurogu (born in Stratford, the last one)? And isn't the Jessica Ennis bird mixed race?
aye once. It was full of darkies but why cast one as one of Brunel's colleagues? and one as an 19th century cricket player in the english countryside? fair enough cast them in the modern era because that is realistic but not back in yester year.
Hes talking about centuries ago ya ****in balloon. When the white supremacists treated coloureds with disdain. They certainly did not allow them privileges back then. Idiot. You want to forget our disgraceful history throughout the world, let alone here.
Exactly, I think it was more insulting to cast them in such roles as it was so unrealistic because of their skin colour! maybe showing them as "servants" wouldn't have sat well with the world wide audience. Old Phil would of liked it though
Linford Christie was black too. There was even a guy who did the ridey horsey thing that was black, he had dreadlocks and everything
To add a bit of proper realism the should have tied a coloured chap to a chair and had a line of well heeled white gentlemen slap **** out of him.
