1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

The FA have charged John Terry

Discussion in 'Chelsea' started by Coolhand83, Jul 27, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
Page 1 of 12
  1. Coolhand83

    Coolhand83 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 7, 2011
    Messages:
    481
    Likes Received:
    0
    #1
    Coolhand83, Jul 27, 2012
  2. Master Yoda

    Master Yoda Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    6,977
    Likes Received:
    346
    Uh-oh...

    Surely he should receive a ban equal to or larger than the one Suarez got?
     
    #2
    Master Yoda, Jul 27, 2012
  3. Sanj

    Sanj Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 1, 2011
    Messages:
    19,108
    Likes Received:
    891
    Lol at the timing of this.
     
    #3
    Sanj, Jul 27, 2012
  4. Master Yoda

    Master Yoda Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    6,977
    Likes Received:
    346
    The FA are clearly trying to slip it in while the opening ceremony takes the headlines.
     
    #4
    Master Yoda, Jul 27, 2012
  5. District Line

    District Line Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2011
    Messages:
    13,366
    Likes Received:
    968
    Predictable
     
    #5
    District Line, Jul 27, 2012
  6. Drogs

    Drogs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Messages:
    17,870
    Likes Received:
    356
    and why's that?

    This. Spineless ****s.

    They had something to fall back on due to the verdict of the court case, now Chelsea will want valid answers and so will our fans.
     
    #6
    Drogs, Jul 27, 2012
  7. Master Yoda

    Master Yoda Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    6,977
    Likes Received:
    346
    Think without your Chelsea hat on, the Suarez case was very debatable... there is, in this instance, clear evidence, and no, Terry's language didn't mean something else in Uruguay...
     
    #7
    Master Yoda, Jul 27, 2012
  8. Varier2

    Varier2 Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,109
    Likes Received:
    37
    I was under the impression (due to the court cases verdict) that charging Terry means Anton also has to go down with him? FA = joke.
     
    #8
    Varier2, Jul 27, 2012
  9. Drogs

    Drogs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Messages:
    17,870
    Likes Received:
    356
    I would have to ask you to think without your Liverpool hat on, Terry was found NOT GUILTY in a court of law with a plausible excuse for uttering the words he is accused of.
     
    #9
    Drogs, Jul 27, 2012
  10. QPR17

    QPR17 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    225
    Likes Received:
    0
    HA
     
    #10
    QPR17, Jul 27, 2012

  11. Yurilly

    Yurilly Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 9, 2011
    Messages:
    2,029
    Likes Received:
    86
    What clear evidence? And what does this have to do with Uruguay? Every time a Liverpool fan tries to compare this to the Evra-Suarez incident they make a mockery of themselves.
     
    #11
    Yurilly, Jul 27, 2012
  12. Drogs

    Drogs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Messages:
    17,870
    Likes Received:
    356
    Thanks for the insightful input, excellent contribution.
     
    #12
    Drogs, Jul 27, 2012
  13. QPR17

    QPR17 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    225
    Likes Received:
    0
    Your welcome darling
     
    #13
    QPR17, Jul 27, 2012
  14. Varier2

    Varier2 Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,109
    Likes Received:
    37
    The FA have to tread carefully. If they charge Terry for using racist language then they are going against a court of law therefore making them look even more ridiculous than the already are, and if they charge him for bringing the game into disrepute then Anton will have to be banned as well because I don't think Terry's outburst was unprovoaked. FA are digging themselves a hole...
     
    #14
    Varier2, Jul 27, 2012
  15. Drogs

    Drogs Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2011
    Messages:
    17,870
    Likes Received:
    356
    If Anton is also charged then so be it, it just makes it look petty. But to charge JT only is ****ing ludicrous.
     
    #15
    Drogs, Jul 27, 2012
  16. Master Yoda

    Master Yoda Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2011
    Messages:
    6,977
    Likes Received:
    346
    The Uruguay reference was tongue in cheek <doh>

    ... Video evidence.

    Also, there is a misconception that being found not guilty is the same thing as being truly innocent. It's not, and if you don't know the difference, well...

    True. Rio should probably be fined for bringing the game into disrepute or some symbolic charge for those tweets, also.
     
    #16
    Master Yoda, Jul 27, 2012
  17. No Kane No Gain

    No Kane No Gain Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 2, 2011
    Messages:
    20,582
    Likes Received:
    3,483
    If he gets 8 games, it looks like he'll be back just in time for a trip to WHL. Should be cracking :D
     
    #17
    No Kane No Gain, Jul 27, 2012
  18. QPR17

    QPR17 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    225
    Likes Received:
    0
    A court of law judges on if Racist language was used with intent which couldnt be properly proved.
    FA charge if the language has been used at all.
     
    #18
    QPR17, Jul 27, 2012
  19. Varier2

    Varier2 Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,109
    Likes Received:
    37
    Which therefor means Anton has to go down as well.
     
    #19
    Varier2, Jul 27, 2012
  20. QPR17

    QPR17 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2012
    Messages:
    225
    Likes Received:
    0
    Where is the evidence that Anton said that?
     
    #20
    QPR17, Jul 27, 2012
Page 1 of 12
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page