I'd just like to echo Spurf's sentiments, here. Couldn't agree more with everything he's said. Arguments about football are fine. Disagreement is both healthy and interesting. Pointless spats with anyone who either holds on alternative opinion or supports another team are both pointless and disruptive. Nobody wants to read 6 pages of spelling and grammar correction, punctuated by insults, do they?
I've had my fair share of run-ins or arguments on here and the old 606 but usually after a couple of replies its like a boxing match, steam is let off and its all hugs and kisses ha ha only thing i will say is that personally i don't mind seeing disruptive characters on forums as often they spark debate which doesn't happen and when people are wound up they tend to say how they actually feel. However the mods are right to ban anyone they feel are bringing the forum down to a level which drives posters away as this is the best spurs forum i have used as its not too busy but has a good selection of posters with varied opinions.
haha I was waiting for you to spot that, Spermcock. I logged the "argumentative twat" comment a few days back.
I genuinely think we have one of the best forum's on the internet going here. Healthy amounts of debate, very little infighting, and a solid unity when the wum's come over from other boards, or even disguised as one of our own fans. And around 90% of the articles are Spurs based, which shows that we can entertain ourselves with only the odd article on other clubs (excluding important current affairs). I enjoy taking a wander around the other boards on here, and its ridiculous to see the infighting on some boards (Swansea) and the dependency on other clubs for conversation on others (Celtic). So there's my little tribute to this board, and thanks to the moderators who perform the thankless task of keeping it this way. Fair play to you gentlemen, your doing this board proud.
Nothing wrong with lovey dovey, could be hatey... raveny.... This wasn't even worth writing, let alone reading.
I'm not sure it was a picture of his nuts. Wasn't it just something he looked up online, as an example of the procedure he underwent?
I am so glad I joined you boys late. Any idea what procedure he was actually talking about, and the context he brought it up in? Purely out of morbid curiosity
I think he had a tear in his scrotum, with the testicle exposed. It was a revolting picture, that I needed therapy to get over.
Yesss... Back to blasting those balls. Minimal ball bursting activity... [video=youtube;vPkbYLjy9eE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPkbYLjy9eE[/video] [video=youtube;KDoLnzDq0i8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KDoLnzDq0i8[/video]
