Complete Financial Meltdown

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
DevAdvocate said:
1: What are you rambling on about?

2: Whit?

3: He says the same about you
Click to expand...

You know what I'm talking about, you've done this several times. When your "beat" you just dodge the subject.

I'm talking about you being a hypocrite. And not for the first time this week.

You're happy to quote people all day from various outlets but as soon as something goes against your beliefs then out comes the "one person said it so it must be true" Shiiiite.
 
chapper said:
You know what I'm talking about, you've done this several times. When your "beat" you just dodge the subject.

I'm talking about you being a hypocrite. And not for the first time this week.

You're happy to quote people all day from various outlets but as soon as something goes against your beliefs then out comes the "one person said it so it must be true" Shiiiite.
Click to expand...

fair enough Boyo .
 
chapper said:
You know what I'm talking about, you've done this several times. When your "beat" you just dodge the subject.

I'm talking about you being a hypocrite. And not for the first time this week.

You're happy to quote people all day from various outlets but as soon as something goes against your beliefs then out comes the "one person said it so it must be true" Shiiiite.
Click to expand...

Rogue's right you know, I don't know why I bother but i'll humour you.


"Who" exactly have I quoted this week?

Have I endorsed any of these quotes and argued that they are "Fact"?

Have you read the SFL plan and if so, do you know who wrote/came up with it?

Is the SFL plan a document which is purely "Factual" in nature or does it contain lot's of "What if" scenarios?

Is this plan above criticism?


Back to you, i've asked some questions so feel free to ask me some but let's keep this on topic = which is the statement in the OP.

<ok>
 
Redwino said:
I thought it was just you !
Click to expand...

<laugh>

That may well be the case, but I doubt it. He seems to have a particular loathing of harry too.

Regarding the OP which chapper seems to fervently believe, in fact he seems to have taken exception to the fact that I think the SFL statement is a load of cack, what's your reading of it?

In my opinion, it is a half baked pile of ****e with no obvious evidence to support it's many claims, one of which is "Complete Financial Meltdown" should Rangers be demoted to SFL3.

Do you buy it?
 
I can't be arsed reading it to tell the truth. I have my own thoughts but nobody has a crystal ball. I think in the medium time there will be a negative financial impact but just how deeply this will affect Scottish football remains to be seen. To be honest I am sick to death of people taking every opportunity to sink the boot in without any consideration for the long term effects nor for the blameless people who will lose all or part of their income through no fault of their own or indeed through no fault of anyone still employed at Ibrox. This hatred has sickened me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back