You know...this planet. Also, you can observe evolution in a lab. You can actually see it happen. It's proven now, there is no debate. Denying evolution is equally as moronic as denying the holocaust. It happened, we've seen it.
They are the remains of aliens that visited our planet millions of years ago. This explains all the anachronisms in life. I have studied this for more than 46 years now so I DO actually know what I'm talking about.
And the people who are just encountering him for the first time. I guess I'll stop wasting my time now.
I think this is probably the best place to dump this "Homeless Ian Beale" pic please log in to view this image
Once again, TFWNN ghapes GC with his remarkable knowledge and understanding of the great conspiracy of 'evolution' that the governments are plying these days. The don't want us to believe in God any more, they want millions of us to be slaves and to build the super rich rockets to take them to heaven and leave the rest of us on a harvested planet to die through war and famine! WE MUST RESIST! Shalom
Species have evolved, there's little doubting that but it was God that created them in the first place
Believe that if you wish, but you should at least acknowledge that there's a lot of doubt, and there are more and more doubters everyday. You're free to believe in creation, but you have to accept that there is no evidence.
And history shows that advanced civilisations are usually treated as Gods. And anyway, once you study a bit of physics you start to realise that nothing actually exists, it's all pure energy interacting with itself. Maybe we're all just avatars in The Matrix.
Sorry fan, macro is just micro evolution over a longer timescale and has been observed on occasion. Many observable examples of evolution are presenting themselves
I put in speach marks for a reason jackie. I dont like the terminology personally but it gets used to describe what i see as the little things that we have evidence for and then the huge things that there isnt any Evolution as a process I dont have any issue with per se, the problem I have is people use it as a 'catch all' argument without truly understanding it. I dont believe there is any evidence for what some on here claim. The usual flies/moths arguments are quite simple to explain and the changes are not as major as some try and use them for
This is the problem with the catch all science people on here refer to. Physics says one thing, biology another and chemistry yet another. dont even get me started on paleontology etc To simply say 'science' is misguided and disingenous.
