please log in to view this image Although, I prefer this theory of evolution please log in to view this image
That would be Ambrosia ig, food of the God's, some would say. Amoeba are single celled organism's rather like your brain matey.
I was going to let this pass, but seeing as 2 of my biggest fans mentioned me more than once I feel its the right thing to do In a nutshell Darwin didnt come up with the theory of evolution. It already existed. The problems with what has become with alot of this is basically people havent read it and have drawn certain conclusions, or wikki/google bits and not the entirety. 'Darwinists' simply add bits to various things when they dont make sense to make it fit. See the eye for example. This under darwins theory was a bit of an enigma, a theory to explain it has arisen. However this explanation theory doesnt fit some of the other concepts. In essence it 'only fits' the eye. As for those who believe in species jumping they may as well teach nessie. Both have never been seen and the pictures have been forged/faked. As I have said before, for those who believe evolution to be true these must have existed simply because evolution takes a LOOOOOOONG time and at one point there must have been a half ape half man and if we all come from the same source then surely an elephant can become a man too? after all some on here think dinosaurs became sparrows
Thats the big bang theory eddie If you referring to Allah/God then you couldnt be more wrong. As creator he is outside of creation so wasnt created as a result of it. So if space and time have a starting point then he doesnt as he was outside of these. If they have an ende he doesnt for the same reason
dont know is the honest answer edd However it obviously not going to be something we understand with our limited minds/knowledge creation as we see it is often via procreation. However the same rules dont have to apply to the creator with him being 'outside' of creation Its like the carpenter who makes a table. They couldnt be more different
Jeeeesus ****ing Christ mate, I don't often come to GC, for obvious reasons, but I just have to chime in here. Go to Google Images and look up neanderthal man. Then look up homo habilis. Then look up homo erectus. Essentially, these are what you would describe as half man/half ape. Elephants won't evolve into man because they have no reason to, but it is physically possible (though extremely unlikely) over millions of years. We both share a common ancestor and have since evolved in different directions. It's a common claim that the theory of evolution has unexplained gaps, which was true when the theory was first conceived, but now if you do some research you'll find that those gaps have since been quite conclusively filled. Evolution is fact.
so what you are saying is that hanuman existed and the hindus are right? I could go into the whole neanderthal man/homo habilis/homo erectus but will await your report and fossil evidence to show the 'evolution' Plugging the gaps doesnt explain anything. Its another theory to try and make the first one true. Evolution in the 'macro' sense is far from fact even at micro level its 'pushed' to fit
Mate, you're wasting your time. The bloke's mental. Most of us just take the piss out of him now. Only the idiots and the equally demented still argue with him.
