Attitude to Gratitude

not bull****, FACT

What happens is when you get owned, after I have pulled on the proverbial rope, and have nothing your deflect/divert/insult and do basically what you have done in this response. I remember in our initial discussions I used to offer a general response whereas you used to be the one going point by point, how ironic then that now i gibve you point by point answers/responses (highlighted) and you just do a general one.

You can pick and choose as many quotes from the likes of bespoke/jip etc as you like. means nothing. Just highlights you are clutching at straws.
This must be the lowest ebb for you, a bespoke quote FFS? what were you thinking? This is worse than the self righteous response you gave to Bolyn ali. I (we) laughed at that one for days

As for winning, dont know about that but I been playing you since your first ever response. It works everytime too. The only regret I have is I cant do it regularly every Friday like I used to. At times there was an audience. TBH there is nothing you have come up with that cant be destroyed in a couple of responses. but there was no fun in that. so I dragged it out for my own personal pleasure. even now I am awaiting Fajr prayers hence the late night responses

NB read up (or google wikki up) on Richard Wright, as am gonna drop him on you next time in detail when you venture over onto a thread I create. Just giving you a heads up as thats how easy it is

 

This is all that you have, Fan.
Self proclaimed victory.

You've offered nothing to respond to anything that I've asked, either theologically or (especially) on matters of the holocaust.
My general response was due to your dishonesty.
You simply won't answer simple questions, despite claiming to have the answers.

That you attempt to claim offence at insults is hilarious, frankly.
You've shown that there are no depths to which you won't resort on that issue.

You claim to have been playing me, but you've somehow missed the point here, despite me pointing it out.
You come here to preach, but you've singled yourself out as a hateful, dishonest, underhand bigot, as a result of those that question you on here.
Who's going to listen to that?

Having fun, Fan? Enjoy your masochism.

 

I always have fun, thanks for asking. Hope you read the edit

You really shouldnt lie to yourself like that you know, its not good for you. Its not a big deal that your beliefs have been questioned and rocked to the core. I say beliefs, truth be know you change them at whim to suit any particular angle you are playing at the time

have to at the assertion wont answer sime questions. repeating it doesnt make it so. something out of nothing doesnt happen as i done told you

I see you listen, judging by how you ALWAYS come onto my threads. Face it laddie you got nothing. By the way do you want sturdy Colls number? to ask her about her study? she is about 2 miles from my house currently. Gonna try and see her if she is available, fancy coming?

do th ehomework on richard wright , I want to see some effort as its getting too easy

 

What an empty comment.
Absolutely no content.

Beliefs rocked to the core!
You see, this is where you betray your own fears, Fan.
If I think that one thing is correct and it's proved to me that it isn't, then I accept that I'm wrong and... that's it.
I don't think that I know everything or that I have all of the answers, so it doesn't do me any harm to learn something new.
You, on the other hand...

Something out of nothing is a theistic claim, by the way.
Despite your repeated insistence that it's something that scientists or atheists suggest, you've yet to show why that's true.
Hollow assertions, unsupported by any evidence, as usual.
The list goes on.

When are you going to offer up something worthwhile, Fan?
This second-rate Christian apologist crap, backed by neo-Nazi propaganda, is just boring.
Prodding you until you unleash the bigot that you fight so hard to hide is ridiculously easy, too.
Up your game, please.

 

<Flangewithnaeforeskin> battered beyond the white rope for six again

 

Just to let you know your latest failures, Fan:

Provide the data that Richard Krege found during his study of Treblinka.
Tell me where in Jewish scripture it says that they "will return minus 6 million".

Shouldn't be difficult.

 

thats basically what I wrote isnt it?

getting desperate PNP?

 

Not difficult in the slightest my dear fellow

But as repeated ad infinitum, I promise to gve yu the rne to those as soon as you answer what I asked first
Its unfair to keep questioning without providing any answers

unless you are admitting there is no answer? in that case own up and voila you shall be answered, thats a promise

 

No. You clearly haven't read it or have just failed to take it in.
Two of the paragraphs are answers to your vapid claims, for a start.

Just more proof that you've got absolutely nothing to say.
Answer the questions or admit that you can't.

 

I have nothing to say?

you basically took what I wrote about you and tried to turn it around. Tit for tat

shouldnt be suprised have yet to see anything original from you

why dont you answer the questions i ask of you, yet demand answers?

 

The questions that I've asked you originate from a thread from months ago and you've still failed to answer either.
You're asking new and irrelevant questions, when I've already explained the reasons for their irrelevance and asking for answers to them first, Fan.

You have nothing to say and you're afraid to answer the questions, as you already know how inadequate the answers are.

 

I have plenty to say and have been saying it for days, point by point I may add, you however have resorted to cheap jibes instead of your usual point by point answers

As I have said in most of our discussions, answer the questions and I PROMISE to answer yours. Yet you provide nothing/nada/zilch. Often ignoring points completely

My questions were/are as relevant as anything you wish to know and were directed at you first. Apart from which I actaully have quoted various bits to you. So Kreges study was discussed in detail last time, including dates of where and when he made presentations. For some reason you seem unable to recall that. Its old ground I am afraid and you well know it. Its not like you dont resort to bringing up old stuff that suits is it?

Funnily enough Krege is even on youtube so its not really difficult to post something from him, and as you are so keen to point out his study is plastered on certain internet sites.

Now answer the questions

 

You're saying nothing Fan, despite posting a lot.
Empty vessels and all that.

We've discussed Krege before and you've never posted a single shred of data from him.
Do you know why? Because he's never released any.
He's made claims, he's attended suitably biased functions, like the Iranian Holocaust Denial Conference and repeated those claims, but he's never released a thing.
Do you know who else attended that conference? A former Grand Wizard of the KKK.

If you believe that he's released a single piece of testable data and not just some unsubstantiated claims, then post them here.
Very, very easy.
The same applies to the piece of Jewish scripture that you've repeatedly claimed foretells the 6m deaths.

You've asked me to discuss something which I've already addressed.
It's irrelevant, I've already shown why and you chose to ask it again, rather than refute my dismissal of it.
You got your answers, despite still failing to provide mine, yet you still can't offer anything.

Cowardice or admittance of failure?

 

I already told you I think you are a coward, who refuses to admit his failures

Yes we have discussed Krege before, hence my point about already answering those questions. His data is pretty straight forward. In a nutshell he found nothing there and believes that an investigation should be carried out to prove or otherwise. As yet (despite the studies currently being carried out and the lack of anything from your 'saviour' colls) nothing. According to you this is an anti semetic viewpoint, yet ist one getting a lot of support from the likes of Richard Wright (i told you to read up)

I dont see the relevance of who attended what, you keep saying he hasnt presented anything then go on to say he 'made claims' at a conference with other 'deniers'. Kind of answers your own question, no? Even your 'saviour' Colls (in the newspaper article YOU submitted) mentions the need to refute Krege. dont tell me she is refuting something he didnt say

The jewish scripture has also been discussed and I recall writing it out for you, nevertheless as soon as you post the answers relating to the number 6 I will re submit it as promised. You have NOT addressed this. Other stuff too but i can let that go. Here is a clue for you read some of what Benyamin Zev Kahane wrote.

so lets cut the crap here and get down to the nitty gritty, you gonna answer or what?


to keep you going

Dr. Chaim Weizmann (president of Israel in 1948) president of the World Zionist Organization on November 25th, 1936 declared the "6 million" number to be symbolic of the Jewish destiny.

 

making me squirm? how did that work out for ya?

what a tit you are. so you go on about 'offended my lad', a blatant lie, yet feel it appropriate to offend every muslim/religious person out there as an attempt to get your own back?

jeez no wonder your mrs is giving you grief and you spend so much time on here with illusions of grandeur

ll I can say is I got you good there is beel in your posts padwan

 

A decent bloke who fundamentally disagrees with homosexuality despite having gay friends?

That must be what Fan means when he talks of hypocrisy.

 

Why would gay people want to be friends with someone who despises the very thing they are? Sorry, I don't believe you.

The whole "I can't hate gays. Some of my best friends are gay" is bullshit. It's like a member of the Ku Klux Klan claiming he's not racist because some of his best friends are black.

You either don't have any gay friends which would make you a liar or you have gay friends but you don't tell them what you really think about them which would make you a hypocrite.