****tard, Chelsea have just won the CL without deserving to win a single game. So England who destroyed the dutch in euro 96 and played fairly well, including being very close to beating Germany came very close to winning it. HAd we beat Germany we would of. Now if you want to continue making yourself look stupid then please do, I will have no problem correcting your stupidity. Spain lost their first game of WC 2010 to the Swiss..... Italy were awful in WC2010. Did you somehow believe the team who plays the best football wins these things?
Ah well, you can only tell idiots they are wrong so many times before you have to give up and let stupid be stupid. Like I said, football, stats, eyes and sense tell you Rio is better than Terry. I can only imagine you 2 are racist and will take part in no further discussion. You're trying and failing to make your points that a black player whos brother was racially abused was not selected due to football reasons despite Rio having a better season than Terry and not being subjected to a court case for racial abuse. I would pity you both if I didnt think you were backwards ****s.
I was waiting for that. I suspect certain members of my immediate family would take quite a bit of exception to that, as would quite a few of my friends and colleagues who know that race simply isn't an issue for me, or I wouldn't be their friend. So i'll reply in kind. I suspect you are a young black male who, instead of studying at school thought he was one of the cool kids who'd grow up to be a professional sportsman or music superstar but instead finds that, due to his lack of scholary achievements or application, can't get a good job, and instead of blaming himself and doing something about it finds it easier to play the victim and hold on to his race card at every opportunity. Most of the black/multi raced people I know would consider you worse than a racist.
What a response. Could of been more perfect if I had sent you a PM and told you to write it. Its exactly what I suspected and confirms my thoughts. Im white aswell. The issue here is much bigger than calling someone a racist name, its people who represent our country.....a country with enough problems and one that doesnt need another racist representing us. Thanks for the amazingly perfect reply though, again, just too good.
You could be in serious trouble for repeatedly calling Terry a racist! Until it goes to court and a verdict is passed, it is only an allegation!
I doubt it somehow. See if he was innocent he would of had a case but the fact he is on video being racist means hes got no leg to stand on. So me calling him a racist isnt going to get me into trouble. Its a bit like when Grobbelaar tried to sue the sun for calling him a cheat.....he won but only for the decision to be over turned as he was in fact guilty of accepting bribes.........the court wanted to make sure his reputaion was ruined and he didnt benefit from suing the sun.
It appears that anyone that conveys an opposite opinion to you automatically becomes a racist. Hence people also in your eyes have become guilty of racism before even proven in a court of law. Your entitled to your opinion and I guess you will obviously keep expressing it to gain a reaction. I therefore also predict and await the next load of verbal insults for pointing that out. Prove me wrong.
I called 2 people a racist who couldnt see any issue with John Terry, a racist caught on video ( the court case is irrelivent, the fact its after the Euros means strings were pulled as they fear hes going to be ****ed ).
My nephew is African American, unlike you he applied himself at school and got a bursary into an extremely good school, where, when I asked him if he ever gets racially abused, he said "yes, sometimes, mainly from Africans, Asians and Arabs" none of the white kids do it. As for me, I live in Croydon where it is almost impossible NOT to have black friends, they're my friends because colour doesn't define us.
You're just a multicultral guy arent you. Would your friends object to being called a black **** and then losing out on a job to the person who had called them a black ****. Please ask them and get back to us will you.
Every part so far of Roy Hodgsons reign tells me he was a superb choice as manager. The squad look relaxed, happy and very much a unit. Whether it was football related (imo Ferdinand isn't good enough anymore on the field anyway), politics (we didn't need a split camp again as in South Africa) or Roy just doesn't fancy him, the decision is made and we have a tournament to play in now. Ferdinand has made a prick of himself over this and in time may regret both his and his representatives outbursts over the last week or so. It has been embarrassing for him. It shows what a negative influence he would have been if he had been picked. We all need to get behind Roy and England from here on in and I have a growning feeling that we will do very well over the next 4 weeks. Come on Hodgsons Heroes.
1. We drew with Spain 0-0. That's what the record books show. They might have had a goal unfairly disallowed, but that doesn't mean they "beat" us If the goal had been allowed, the game could've been completely different. You can't just change one decision in a match and claim that would've been the only way the match would've been different 2. That's not "unlucky". That's poor recovery by the Scots and quick thinking by the English. Unlucky is a freak injury, a massive deflection or a ridiculous refereeing decision. 3. What do you base that on? Do you know enough about the Dutch side of 1963 (last 50 years) to compare them to a team that had some very good players in it (van der Sar, Seedorf, Kluivert, Bergkamp, as well as several of the Ajax team that won the Champions League only 12 months previously)? 4. Yes, because the host nation should always win, shouldn't they? Let's have a look at the host nations of the Euros/WCs over the last 25 years: Poland/Ukraine South Africa Austria/Switzerland Germany Portugal South Korea/Japan Belgium/Netherlands France England USA Sweden Italy Only one host winner, and only Italy, Holland, Portugal and Germany would be considered shrewd bets in their respective tournaments as hosts. So along with somewhat surprising winners France, that's only 5 out of 12 tournaments where the hosts have either won it or looked likely to win it. Why are you so negative about England?
