I know your just being childish now but I'll bite on that one, Young is more effective as a winger but Mata is more creative as an attacking midfielder.
Your entitled to your opinion but I stand by mine, Young is much more effective as a wide man which is where both often start, but when they play in the center Mata is a much more creative player.
Mata is a top player, but I think Young is also a top player aswell and doesn't get the respect his performances deserve. He is one of the few players in the England team that can make things happen
Young nearly became a Chelsea player last year. Ancellotti rated him highly, and would of given us some competition for his signature, had he not been unfairly sacked*
The irony of a Chelsea fan having a pop at Young for 'cheating'* I'm sure if we had a 'who's the biggest cheat' thread, Drogba would win hands down*
Not really, it's purely subjective based on opinion which will always have a slant of bias. I think Young is better than Mata on that basis. Put it this way, for England to have any chance at all of getting out of our group then it will depend entirely on Hodgson's ability to get the most out of Young as he is our most important player, bar none. If we're to score any goals it will come via him one way or other.