Utd will be ok for FFP. It's not about being in debt it's about not creating more debt. Man Utd are servicing their debt so it wont be a problem.
haha, I just blanked on what it is called, but something along the lines of black is to white as night is to day, something that relates to that. KPR to man United could be hate hate ( a la bloods crips) , moth to a flame ( they bait him pretty bad and he baits them), and Ricky Bobby and Crepes not sure on that one, just know they don't apparove of each other yet though do ( as a fin pancake).
It won't matter if they are servicing their debt.I'll tell you why.When they are servicing their debt,they will be making losses.And thats what UEFA are cutting down on.So if they make more than ã15 million in losses a year,they won't be playing in Europe.
"fin pancake" comes in more on the end..... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZDqXbk_ThH0&feature=related
No prob, This movie always cracks me up, the stereotyping is so bad it's funny. "These colors don't run"
He is the boil on our ass If we make more than ã15 million a year in losses on ongoing football business. Of our ã83.6 million losses last year, ã60 million were one off losses and ã35 million were goodwill write offs from the Glazer's purchase of the club. So for FFP purposes, we made a profit of around ã22 million
The only thing is Man United didn't make ã83.6 million in losses.The figure was ã108.9 million.So where is your profit.?
This bank knowledge of each club will go on until we buy players or united do/don't..... I will never be an accountant or in charge of anyone's books I can tell you that much. A boil? I thought it was more like a mosquito bite, you just keep scratching it when you know you are not supposed to!
You appear to be confusing a holding company with a football club... http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2010/oct/08/manchester-united-losses Anyway, we've gone down this road before. I'm 100% confident we will be fine under FFP rules and have no more to say on the subject That's a better metaphor - annoying as **** but it feels so good to scratch (or in KPR's case mock) the little bugger!
wherever you get your jolly's from swarbs! haha. I know Bebe was a bad purchase but I think I saw on the old 606 (?) that some were rating Vela way higher than hernandez. Now, obviously I do not like nor support United, but I know about the Concacaf and ya Vela has showed glimpses, but a player like Hernandez is hard to find, that humble, works extremely hard for the cause, and somehow someway finds a goal! I think he is likened to Solksjaer at United? I think Kuyt is the closest we have to that "tap-in" guy that he is pretty unfairly labeled. Any news on how we are lining up on Sunday? I really hope no Soto, just makes me cringe that type of football/player
Thanks...I think! Oh, and I know I said I wouldn't say anything more about this, but here's the BBC's analysis of the FFP rules: http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/9450671.stm Like I said KPR - "United made a pre-tax loss of ã79m in 2010 but, by Uefa's measure, actually returned a positive break-even result of ã42m." So if anything, my back of the envelope calculation was an underestimate.