Brendan done nothing, it's a binding agreement by the two clubs, he would not have had much input into the compensation side of things as its not his concern.
thats bolox valley ...brendan is liverpool manager and if he so wish can come in for any of our players. its impossible to add such clause as a gentleman's agreement is the only way. what if the players are not happy with such clause because jinks is stopping them from a possible move to liverpool. they would bring in the players union before you can say jack robinson. the only way is if brendan himself says he wont come in for anyone for the next 12 months....and another point even then brendan can be overruled if the director of football wishes, it rarely happens if a gentleman's agreement has been made....
A possible move? Who says Liverpool would want our players? Sorry Dai, but your talking ****. Theresca contract in place with Liverpool, and its signed. Simple.
Oh god you really are a twonk of the highest order, dainumpty. It's standard procedure between clubs to have this woven into a compo agreement. If players "aren't happy" with the club they are contracted to play for preventing a move then tough ****. Btw I think you'll find that if other clubs bid for our players the agreement doesn't prevent Liverpool from bidding as well. You pontificate, but you know jack ****.
Good news if it's true. I said on our board, if MM leaves I can imagine Whitts won't be far behind. Unfortunately, it may still scupper your bid for Glyfi as he isn't a Swan. I hope for both clubs the manager situation is sorted quickly.
the thing is i know im right and if anyone on here is clued up with the rules then they would back me up...no clause can ever be implemented unless it is agreed by both clubs and then not a written clause... and seeing as jinks says he has implicated it shows him to be a liar.....as no such clause can ever be made only a gentleman's agreement that you take on trust..All players in any club have the right to listen to offers for them...sorry i know what im talking about and jinks cannot in any shape or form add a clause that stops or interferes with a player career.....all he can do is ask the club for a gentleman's agreement that they wont poach any of our players for a period of time...and that is what is going to happen....the players are now aware that liverpool for the next 12 months wont be coming in for them, If a clause was implemented by jinks then that is against the rules of players careers....you can argue all you want on this as i know cattagoritly im right...
no one replying then....thought not kangaroo numpty.. get yourself clued up on the rules next time you try to be clever..
It's not a gentlemans agreement, Brendan Rodgers does not have the power to authorise that at Liverpool ! It's a commercial decision by both clubs not to allow this. It does not interfere with any players careers as it is up to Liverpool who they employ, it's not as if these players apply for a job in the normal sense, they are approached by clubs, there is a huge difference! I work in my company in that area as I deal with recruitment amongst other things, and it is required that we study employment law, I suggest before you post again that you take a look at it.
the clubs ffs listen...the clubs have agreed on our wish not to poach our players. liverpool could have easily said no, and that is their prerogative. they have no obligation to us whatsoever, it was due to brendan that this has happened as jinks cannot implement a clause of that kind ....its impossible as the players union would be right on him like a shot
Superswan the clubs have both agreed it, one cannot do it without the other's consent! Huw ensured our club was protected from Liverpool for next season together with compensation for the people lost ! I don't know where you get your interpretation of employment law, but basically you can't force a company to employ someone, there is no infringements of rights should a company not offer you a job, providing it doesn't discriminate. What you are basically saying is that if you go to an interview it infringes your rights if you don't get it .
Contrary to popular belief I actually have a life outside this forum. Bit like taking the kids to Tenby on match days.
Is this something along the lines you mean Valley http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Contract_law Contract law is like double dutch to me, but I do understand the basics.
Superswan, You obviously dont know what you are on about as such an agreement can easily be made PLUS this would have obviously been instigated from our side because if Liverpool didnt agree with this, then we could have told them in no uncertain terms to **** off when they requested to speak to Rodgers!!
Dai, reports are all stating, not suggesting, that Rodgers is barred from approaching our players. No mention of a gentleman's agreement, more of a contractual agreement. If you would like a link to the numerous sites then just ask, I will be more than happy to correct you.
