Ha, you lot never cease to amaze... Just a few months back the sfa were the scum of the earth etc and must be stood upto... Now however... Yeah I'm sure you's would have taken it on the chin too!
Chapper, show me where I have sung the praises of the SFA They are ****s They are Michael Corleone You are Fredo You have ****ed your brothers over after they tried to help you It's hilarious the outrage shown towards the SFA when the reported that they could have expelled you.....what do you go and do....force them to look at that option again You hear that? Al Neri is asking to take you fishing
Show me where I said you sung their praises... Also show me my outrage towards the sfa... And what's all this ****ing brothers chat?...
A season ago when we were getting punished by the SFA and taking them to task over improper application of their rules (with the help of the recently departed Paul McBride) you daft ****s kept telling us to "take your punishment" and "take it on the chin and move on" etc. At least when we did it we did so with the knowledge that the punishments were likely to be reduced unlike you daft ****s
The embargo was improper application of the rules. The judge said so. Yes, the next punishment may well be much harsher. But doing the right thing is sometimes the harder route to travel. It's called integrity.
Not really comparable, you had two standard punishments and you used a loophole to combine them. (loophole, like the ebt's...) If we had two one year bans and tried to take them at once you may have a point... If you murder two people that's two murders, you don't get to take the two 12yr stretches at the same time.
Depends on the judge, and the crime(s). The judge can rule that the sentence has to run concurrently or consecutively. Your team wants to get away with murder with no penalty whatsoever, that's a different story. <johnniecochran>
At Lennon's appeal the president George Peat was meant to be doing the Scottish cup draw , for some unknown reason he stayed behind and even entered the room to see how it was going!! The same man seen celebrating a Rangers goal in a old firm game . How would you guys deal with Doncaster or Regan celebrating a Celtic old firm goal ???
rangers didn't take the SFA to court. their administrators did. why don't the SFA just explain to FIFA that it was administrators who know nothing about football that took them to court. they will still be able to give rangers another harsher penalty to keep the raging tic fans happy, but at least it might get FIFA off their backs regarding threats to other scottish teams.
What about the time that he greeted the Celtic players off the bus at parkhead by high fiving everyone of them as they jumped off? That was straight after an Old Firm game. Was that fair?
No they don't. And they're also handing out penalties that aren't on the scale of possible punishments. ie, handing out the death penalty for burglary...
Harrys logic stuns everyone including himself. I've never came across such a babbling idiot and the people who hang out his arse are just as bad.
Expulsion/Death was a possible punishment Taking a spending junkie away from his cheque book isn't doing the junkie a bad turn.....its helping him Oh well, just kneecap them instead