1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Fifa

Discussion in 'General Chat' started by Ciaran, May 29, 2012.

  1. Ciaran

    Ciaran Going for 55

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Messages:
    44,688
    Likes Received:
    30,948
    What is their stance on clubs taking their national association through the legal courts?
     
    #1
  2. irishgreen

    irishgreen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    6,206
    Likes Received:
    26
    As long as these clubs pay their taxes there is no problem with it.<whistle>
     
    #2
  3. Otto Flayshow

    Otto Flayshow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    14,150
    Likes Received:
    3,751
    What is their stance on national associations not providing means of arbitration for their constituent clubs?
     
    #3
  4. Mind The Duck

    Mind The Duck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    39,033
    Likes Received:
    15,215
    Kill the club or kill the association









    Yalday
     
    #4
  5. Trypsin-1

    Trypsin-1 Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    6,126
    Likes Received:
    19
    What is their stance on jelly and ice cream? <whistle>
     
    #5
  6. Ciaran

    Ciaran Going for 55

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Messages:
    44,688
    Likes Received:
    30,948
    Would that be the associations responsibility?
     
    #6
  7. Mind The Duck

    Mind The Duck Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2011
    Messages:
    39,033
    Likes Received:
    15,215
    It means nothing as its the associations ruling that was dismissed by rangers and that is what FIFA will look at

    Rangers now need to be punished for the original crime and for going to the court

    And its over an embargo that means **** all anyway.....if anything the embargo helped rangers by stopping an avenue of debt for 1 year

    Deary deary me <laugh>
     
    #7
  8. Otto Flayshow

    Otto Flayshow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    14,150
    Likes Received:
    3,751
    Of course. It was the SFA's rules that denied Rangers the option of going to the Court of Arbitration.
     
    #8
  9. RebelBhoy

    RebelBhoy Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2011
    Messages:
    25,218
    Likes Received:
    1,136
    Delicately balanced I would imagine.
     
    #9
  10. Ciaran

    Ciaran Going for 55

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Messages:
    44,688
    Likes Received:
    30,948
    Within the SFAs rules there is a clause barring member clubs from taking a case to the CAS?
     
    #10

  11. Otto Flayshow

    Otto Flayshow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    14,150
    Likes Received:
    3,751
    The judge seems to think so.

     
    #11
  12. Ciaran

    Ciaran Going for 55

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Messages:
    44,688
    Likes Received:
    30,948
    That can't be right.

    Everyone has a right to take it to the CAS.

    That isn't exactly conclusive Tarquin.
     
    #12
  13. Jip Jaap Stam

    Jip Jaap Stam General Chat Moderator
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2011
    Messages:
    15,541
    Likes Received:
    2,320
    I don't know. But I do know their stance on giving the World Cup to unworthy hosts in exchange for bribes <grr>
     
    #13
  14. Otto Flayshow

    Otto Flayshow Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2011
    Messages:
    14,150
    Likes Received:
    3,751
    A rule stating that the appeal decision is final seems about as conclusive as you can get.
     
    #14
  15. Tina_old

    Tina_old Princess

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2010
    Messages:
    19,851
    Likes Received:
    114
    didn't Sion do something similar and were punished heavily by FIFA?
     
    #15
  16. Ciaran

    Ciaran Going for 55

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Messages:
    44,688
    Likes Received:
    30,948
    Tarquin I see that statement as two.

    1. The 'SFA had not been explicit enough in recognising the Court of Arbitration for Sport'

    2. The SFA 'rules stated an appeal decision was final, suggesting there was no other recourse for the club.'

    Suggesting mmmmm.

    The rules are final within the association and how far you can go with said association.
     
    #16
  17. Ciaran

    Ciaran Going for 55

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Messages:
    44,688
    Likes Received:
    30,948
    Yes.

    The Swiss FA hit Sion with a transfer embargo. A Swiss court said it wasn't legal. Sion signed players and played them (against Celtic no less.) The football authorities struck Sion with a 30 odd point deduction and they were relegated.

    Rangers fans seen all this happening last season.
     
    #17
  18. anportmorbhoy

    anportmorbhoy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2010
    Messages:
    2,381
    Likes Received:
    77
    What it means therefore is whatever alternative they determine that is in the rules then there is no appeal, so if they expel rangers, which is a punishment - one they considered- then rangers have no route of appeal
     
    #18
  19. Ciaran

    Ciaran Going for 55

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2011
    Messages:
    44,688
    Likes Received:
    30,948
    FIFA blanked a court decision in Switzerland, where they are based, and Rangers fans think they are going to **** a brick over a Scottish court.
     
    #19
  20. Tina_old

    Tina_old Princess

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2010
    Messages:
    19,851
    Likes Received:
    114
    But, they are the people????
     
    #20

Share This Page