He wants to strip Rangers of their titles, (obviously to keep the tic happy), but if they form a newco they won't be punished. it all seems a bit strange. If only it could all be sorted out fairly without any sectarian bias deciding on the punishment. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/18225255
If the huns are stripped of titles, it won't only be Celtic who will benefit. Thanks for trying though x
Doncaster will have to remove titles during the period in which rfc played inelligible players. Furthermore, clubs were denied SPL placing money which went to rfc who were cheating. CL money went to the rfc coffers when it should have gone elsewhere. CL Group Stage money was denied to clubs like Copenhagen, who will probably petition Uefa for a prolonged European football ban on the CLUB. Uefa punish the club not the company. Should be interesting.
Said that on a post yesterday , Rangers have gone to a Scottish court , we should be knocking the door down as well . For lost champions league revenue 30/40 million !!!!
Terrible place, one of the worst in South Yorkshire. I don't know what the deal with it is. AIDS capital of the UK, so they say. Poor bastards.
can you enlighten me on the sectarian bias that will decide the punishment? if you are stripped of titles it will not be to keep celtic happy. if (and i believe its a big if) you are stripped of titles its because you have been found guilty of cheating.
What about the HMRC fella that has cheated by breaking the data protection act. He should be caught and punished, then HMRC should be held accountable not the employee and therefore drop the case. Fair's fair.
Cheats should never prosper you say. An employee of HMRC has openly broke the law. Case should be thrown out, big & small tax cases. And a public apology from HMRC on prime time television.
Or everyone bends over backwards to help them: http://sport.stv.tv/football/clubs/...l-to-meet-requirements-to-play-in-top-flight/
