J o K e R...Public Message

Leazes, Ashley is just a prick.

 

Oh right, so because Leazes is 19 he can't be a good moderator?

That's bullshit. Nothing wrong with this being public, states that if you're a dick then you'll get called on it publicly. Simple fact is, don't be a dick and you won't get official warning articles. Simple.

 

Age is nothing to do with it! I was moderating and administrating large forums with in excess of 4000 members when I was 15! To be honest in such a job it's best to keep your age secret. I kept my age secret and ran it all decently, but I bet you if they knew how young I was they woulda tried to get away with a lot more things and I woulda have less control.

Leazes made it public because, to be honest, joker needed publicly announcing as a bit of a tit and on a warning. To be fair, we were all told off at the same time for replying **** to such **** in the first place, so y'know.
Leazes is doing a fine job, end of.

 

I just don't think its right to do publically, he is learning, as I would be if it was me. Don't think anyone is having a go. Its called constructive criticism.

 

we can learn from constructive criticism. constructive criticism is gooood

 

I've been told that a million and one times.

 

was mine the 1,000,001 time? Damn, I missed out on the millionth by one
normally you win boats or holidays for that ****.

 

Rep

 

This! Leazes publicly writes a scathing comment about Joker and it's due to his immaturity and age...Don't people do that about Tash every other day? Joker you yourself are as guilty of it as anyone else!

 

To be fair I think there are times when I've told people they've been out of line towards Tash.

 

Aw weh, fair enough

 

Can't we just all get along?

 

please log in to view this image

awww Friend

 

That's a small photo.

 

Just checked my rep there after aginairrr brought it up...

I received negative rep for a comment on the thread about the policeman being murdered...Now as it was only really Joker who had anything negative to say about the thread (even Mick left a comment of debate) and the negative rep was in a comment aimed at the Joker when I swore a number of times, I assume that it was him who gave the negative rep.

Here is my comment which received neg rep:

and here is the Jokers response:

So...Not only did you swear and use 'Disgusting Profanity' yourself, which was the justification for my neg rep, but you then accuse me of being childish...I gave you no reputation nor did I make a complaint about you.

Not only are you clearly a childish **** of the highest order who attempts to lord it over people with your 'couldn't give a ****' attitude, you are a complete and utter hypocrite to boot!

I realise 'reputation' on an internet forum is not the be-all and end-all in life, but the fact that you 'agreed' that the way you were singled out by moderators was probably due to their age is a complete ****ing joke!

 

Deary me, I put up worse than that and never got neg rep.

 

Was tempted to neg rep you to make you feel included

(I didnt though, incase anyone does and you think its me. )

 

All praise the self-righteous Jesus was a Geordie...

Seriously mate, you need to look at yourself before accusing me of being a hypocrite.
I have had a stack of negative rep,(couldn't give a ****), with ugly messages left but have I launched an enquiry?

You really need to discover yourself a hobby.

I suppose you would even argue that your post was not full of 'disgusting profanity' then?
My reply features swearing in direct reply to your potty mouth comments.

Just try to move on or at least watch a soap opera, that way you can get a fix of the melodrama you so obviously crave...

 

Leazes!!! Ffs will you kill this thread!!???

 

Yes good idea.