Are you having a laugh? Times have changed a lot then. Since I worked for a very large high-tech player in Calif & Texas.(and the rest of the unimportant world) - over 10 years ago. Scenario - Qtr 1 business good - message hire fast to cope, QTR 2 business not so good - avoid adding costs, QTR 3 downturn noted - fire some staff, QTR 4 business good again- so why have I not exceeded targets set 1 year ago??? The cycle repeats itself - ****ing madness. Ethics? - don't make me sick. And the management preach the god fearing message ..... what a laugh.
Thomas Jefferson uttered some wise words about private banking What people don't realise is that the banks don't need to create interest (debt) because they have enough money to invest to make very healthy returns. Interest is greed and it cripples people right from Governments (who slash public services and raise taxes) down to the ordinary individual (who has to work for years to pay off his debt to the banks) What is important to remember in all of this is that the private companies (Federal reserve and Bank of England) don't own the money, they create it and it's not even all real money (much of it is simply figures on a computer screen) They then lend this invisible money (that they don't own) at interest and rake in the profits. It's the biggest confidence trick ever created.
That Thomas Jefferson statement is one of the most honest and greatest statements of all time. Another: "Whomsoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all industry and commerce and when you realize that the entire system is very easily controlled, one way or another, by a few powerful men at the top, you will not have to be told how periods of inflation and depression originate." - James Garfield (20th President of the United States) "Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes the laws." -Mayer Rothschild (one of, if not the biggest crook in history)
The US national debt is currently around 9 trillion dollars. That means that the US govt is indebted to the federal reserve to the tune of 9 trillion dollars, which basically equates to the US public being in debt to a private company to the tune of 9 trillion dollars (don't forget to add the interest) This is a bond of slavery that can never realistically be broken.
I dont see your point. I also work for an American Company and and spend 2-6 weeks out there every year. I was just pointing out there are a large number of American businesses (particularly on the West Coast) that try to be a little more 'ethical' in their business practise. (Trader Joes, Wholefoods, Patagonia etc..)
Sorry Bear, but a company like Trader Joe's will likely be fully indebted to it's bank - especially on it's retail properties. Paying back the fraudulent interest to its banker will come before any well being of its staff. edit : perhaps not though, i did a little digging on their finances and would agree they are a sound business.
Own? Own? Can you point me to definition of the word own which would make your statement correct? Why am I even bothering with you? I first thought you might be a conspiracy nut with some unique take on things, apparently you're just a run of the mill conspiracy nut. By the way the involvement of the Rothschild family in the banking industry is pretty transparent, no conspiracy behind it. And no they don't own the Federal reserve or the bank of England by any twisted definition of that word.
I will not do your research for you, as you seem lazy with nothing of interest to say, however I do pity the ignorant so I will help you. Start your research with Prince William IX and Mayer Rothschild.
Lol are you serious? I'm aware of both of them. And this proves Rothschilds own[1] the Fed and Bank of England? This is too good. [1] do note the present tense, even though that too is irrelevant.
I think people need to realise that the 'austerity measures' that we're seeing across Europe are from a direct result of the private banks gambling our money and losing it. The banks got us into this mess and the people are expected to bail them out. In Britain alone our Govt borrowed £180bn (from a private company) to bail out the failing banks. And we have to pay it back, through cuts to public services like the NHS, smaller pensions, having to work longer before retirement and increased taxation.
There's an interesting article here called 'Who owns and controls the Federal Reserve' http://www.usagold.com/federalreserve.html It's written by a gold merchant, so make of that what you will.
Because he felt he wasn't being given enough transfer funds only for Villa to dump £24m or something on Darren Bent a few months later. So obviously funds were available. Most clubs have to spend within their means, so if Aston Villa couldn't afford to give Martin O'Neil £50m to compete with the big clubs, is that really the owners fault?
There are literally hundreds of sources - which hopefully gent is off educating himself on now One of the best books to read is 'The House of Rothschild' - read it years ago, it's a good account of the early years of the Rothschilds.
That ownership structure is interesting - I have seen it before. The Rockerfellers and the Rothschilds are actually part of the same extended family through marriage, and one other name that always jumps out is the Schiff family. It was Jacob Schiff that was originally sent to the USA by the Rothschilds - before even Warburg.
Well, there are lots of different views out there Jayram. The internet is awash with opinions and counter opinions. Personally, I like to read both sides of the story and in my experience, the truth usually lies somewhere in the middle. But it's my opinion that the Federal Reserve is nothing more than opportunistic scam of private entrepreneurs, dressed up as the economic safety net of the US govt. As I mentioned, there is no need for debt. Face value should be just that, if you borrow $5 you should pay back $5 not $9. But the operations and motives of these private enterprises have been on such a huge scale, that they have literally sucked in whole nations, who are indebted and enslaved to them. But like I say, that is just my opinion.
That is not an 'opposite' view though, if your intention was being objective. One from a company with a conflict of interest, another from a fringe conspiracy group. Why is it that no one is answering the direct question on ownership though? Jayram made an absolute statement as far as the ownership of the two institutions, and i questioned that. (polite version ) The influence throughout history of the Rothschild family (and many others) is not in question. Their current (legal might I add) involvement in the industry is public knowledge and they are only a small part of the equation.
I agree - shame you dont apply the same to football! (just kidding) The only need for debt is to make money for the few. If the process involved the rich lending money they actually had to the poor for reasonable interest then I would not be against this, but the fact is that bankers lend imaginary money to the rich and poor alike and charge extortionate interest for themselves on this imaginary money in order to make themselves the richest people on the planet. As I said at the start of this debate the biggest fraud perpetrated on the people in the whole of human history.
