maybe if you didnt just follow the crowd and look into the different theories you may be enlightened. Mick was re the Liger Just look at macro evolution in its entirety, from the single cell organism to the human. Although presented as 'fact' how do they explain where the added bits came from? I meanin terms of information in human dna/genetics and the single cell organism. Believe me its a huge leap of 'faith'
well googled, but now break those down and you will find at least 5 different theories for this. each one disagreeing with the other. In the end the result being 'havent a clue' but need to make it fit As I have continuously said by all means laugh at religion, but dont try and make some of the alternatives any less of a 'fairytale', its often more ridiculous than the created the world in 6 days
Nobody's claiming that cats will turn into dogs. That's a total misrepresentation of the theory. There are a lot of problems with that statement. Your claim about *****s isn't addressed at all. You haven't provided anything to suggest that disability hasn't decreased. Humans fight against natural selection constantly. Evolution would suggest that such variations would still occur on a similar ratio, anyway.
'Just look at macro evolution in its entirety, from the single cell organism'. To right Fan, it's a bloody big shop.
and there we have it ladies and gents, when losing an argument resort to abuse will we ever 'evolve' past this? who knows
No, because there's no such thing as species jumping or macroevolution. They're just creationist mysticism posing as science. *****philia is a disability? Not sure how you came to that conclusion. Has disability increased? Based upon...? What you're trying to say.
stats from various disability organisations, although I do accept, as with a lot of scientific theories where they often are not, other factors need to be considered
The moon's not out yet. You'll have to wait a couple of hours before you can start flinging your **** at it
The term is gibberish. It suggests that something will suddenly turn from a fish into a lizard or something. It's just evolution over a long period of time. I'm not sure how someone can accept that things change all the time, in small amounts, but don't change in any large amount over large amounts of time. It's like accepting that I can walk one mile in one day, but that if I did this for a week that I couldn't travel 7 miles. What would a moral judgement have to do with evolution? Could you give an example of this, please?
Disability Solutions stoke on trent . I am sure its googleable. I was recently discussing disability in the work place and some stats suggested nearly 20%. These stats were on paper which is with DS SOT. I can try and get some if you actually disagree or have any stats to the contrary
Alcoholism is classed under new reports as a disability, whereas 50 years ago this was most likely not the case (couldn't find the exact date the government classed it as a disability but it highlights the point). Reported disabilities may well now be higher, but you would have to take into context the fact that medical science is finding new disabilities all the time. Are the incidents of a specific condition increasing? If so are they more widely reported due to better cultural understanding? Is there an external cause such as contamination or drug abuse? Most of these studies aren't very informative.
