To a degree these questions are answered in religious teachings To a degree these questions are irrelevant in the debate As you yourself have said, you believe there was a creator and that is the issue at hand.
Yes I honestly believe the people who have dedicated their entire lives to researching such things using Scientific Method, over your twenty-seconds-of-thought post which provides absolutely no evidence to the contrary. We're all made from the same stuff doesn't account for the very obvious changes in our gene pools which can be tracked over generations, as they change. I'm sure god created the Neanderthals, or pygmy humans as well and then changed his mind to decide he didn't like big foreheads or midgets.
Here's my thoughts for what it's worth: Even if the answer to the question "who made us?" is "god", that still leaves the unanswered question "who made god?". If the answer to that question is also "god" then apparently life can begin on its own without the need for a creator.
'To a degree', but not fully. And don't start lying Fan, you're lowering the tone. I never said I believed in a creator. I said I doubted, but couldn't discount it 100%. This is where you really let yourself down. Lying.
To be honest, it's shameful that they are continuing to engage in conversation with someone who has clear mental health problems. Shame on you Mick and Jip!
You are arguing 2 things here Mick 1 - evolution as in species jumping, to which there is no evidence 2 - changes in humans feature wise In terms of point 2, I have no issues you only have to look at the world today to see some of these changes. My own kids are an example due to being teh product of a mixed race marriage Here is a thought for you, IF we did evolve from monkeys (or dogs as you have argued), is it possible for a man to impregnate these creatures? PS big foreheads and midgets exist today, often born from parents without these features and vice versa yet to see a human give birth to a monkey
That is in itself a valid question to which we dont have an answer However what is feaisble is that 'God' existed outside of creation (as in the earth etc) as he created it. So isnt a part of creation To be part of creation, as in in it, he would also be the created if you see what I mean
I put to a degree depending on peoples religions, personally I have the answers within my belief I wasnt lying either, I based it on I'm not sure I'm wholly against the idea of a 'creator'. I doubt it, but I wouldn't discount it out of hand. But if there was one, that's all he was, a creator. Once he'd created the world (if he did), he ****ed off and left us to it.
In that case you got me on that one I dont know what that word is cant even find it on google logomania however has a picture of you next to it and the description pathologically excessive (and often incoherent) talking
enlighten us what does it mean? Jip has an english degree, lets see if he knows, JIP? does it exist or is simply ST fooking up AGAIN
