I'm merely pointing out a factual inaccuracy that he's made, Sam. It's pointless debating his views upon homosexuality, as they're set by his faith and I agree with his opinion about gays marrying in places of worship that are morally opposed to homosexuality. As for Irishgreen's claim, I have no idea why you'd think that, to be honest. Care to explain?
No, they're not. It's called The Civil Partnership Act 2004, but it wasn't passed until December 5th 2005, as I've already pointed out.
#146 ''It's called The Civil Partnership Act 2004.....'' But as usual you must be correct. I mean why on earth do they have to call it the 2004 act? despite introducing it in 2004
Sorry IG, you can only go as far back as to when you first took it up the arse, not when you were introduced to it
I dont know mate. Have you ever heard them arguing or had an argument with one? Jeez . They are 10x friggin worse One of the guys in our office was gay, 6 foot 7 he was, something like size 19 feet. His other half was average. Seen them arguing It was like 20 women horrible
So presumably George Orwell's 1984 was written in 1984 then, wasn't it? It's called The Civil Partnership Act 2004 because that's when it was introduced. It didn't come into effect until December 5th 2005. The first one was on that date, rushed through as one of them was dying and others followed two weeks later. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4540226.stm I'm not sure what you're doh'ing about, as the comment you've quoted clearly states exactly that. And he's wrong, which I've shown repeatedly. I dread to think when you believe the film 10,000 BC was made.
do you actually know the diufference between how the law works and how works of fiction work? You really have reached new heights of stupidity, its even suprised me
