Man Utd's first XI and Man City's first XI both cost roughly the same amount. Accepted figures seem to be Man Utd £160m and Man City £169m. Man Utd are very similar to Man City in the way that they 'bought' their way into the elite of English football. What they did in '89 is very similar to what Man City are doing now - and since then they have continued to spend large amounts.
Loftus Road is a dump, and I've wanted Bolton to get relegated for ages. That's why I think QPR will draw and Bolton will survive after a 10-0 win.
Would be nice to see City win the league for the sheer rubbish we'll hear from Man Utd fans about how City have brought the league - something Man Utd have "never done" and to see QPR down.
stoke v bolton should be on tv instead of man united, if city go 2 up after 10 minutes its a waste of time ...
Citeh to lift the trophy for me. Just so it wipes the smarmy arrogant smile off red faced alcoholic gum chewing Fergusons face.
[video=youtube;8exVcUTaFtA]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8exVcUTaFtA[/video] Sums it up well i think.
Anyone see that bloke who had Man City 2011/2012 premier league champions tatooed on his arm? Laugh if they balls it up just for that.
Nah, it was more to do with the outrage after we sang 'town full of bombers' during our first game in the Championship after promotion.
**** me, it's game on! I hate the way the pundits like to **** each other off about Yaya Toure, but you can't deny that when he's not been on the pitch citeh have not been the same team.