Seb: "There is nothing wrong. We decided to abort the lap to have a free choice of tyres for the race. If I had set a lap, we would have to start the race on soft tyres. In Q2, the first run was crucial. I didn't manage to pull a lap out so I had to use my final set of tyres to get into Q3. We simply weren't quick enough. We'll see how it goes for tomorrow. We were a bit surprised how much of a step the others could do. But I'm quite confident for race, we always have a good race car. We have a couple of new sets which has proved successful for others in previous races this year."
Exactly. And that's why it wasn't Hamilton's hamster; It was Whitmarsh's! (dun dun dunnnnnn) At least, according to the conspiracy theorists.
Is hamilton even under investigation? I've seen no mention of it anywhere, so these last 4-5 pages have actually been a waste of pixels.
The race stewards do not take into account which member of the team made a mistake, they just punish the driver of car number x. Your argument is sophistry and irrelevant.
I thought Whitmarsh owned an evil ray-gun that when fired forces the tyre to stick to the axle at pitstops? Thats what i heard anyway.
I was thinking Big John instead. He seems more comfortable in the car, especially in the final sector.
No idea. I'm a bit past caring. If he gets a penalty I'll hardly be able even to enjoy it now. That's a joke, by the way.
Just found this quote from a guy on F1Fanatic: Lol, RBR have a fixation with dropping their pants it would seem.
