Please don't let facts get in the way of a good conspiracy.Obviously,because we are skint we could'nt afford the FA's help this season......damn Glazers....
They haven't chalked off a single Young dive in their decisions. They also fail to address Balotelli winning a penalty against Spurs, when he should've already been dismissed, an offence he was banned for retrospectively. Doesn't seem like a very accurate piece of work, does it?
They changed every decision that was obvioulsy wrong. If they could side with the refs they did. Its more accurate than the refs.
Obviously lots of this will be disputed, but its unlikely to be miles wide of the mark. Certainly the conspiracy theories are unsuprisingly completely untrue. I would also say it generally supports the "these things even out" argument. Sure the are changes but none are massive to the extent where you can blame the end result on the refs rather than your own teams failings. For example we lose 4 in the battle with city, but blew 8 ourselves with some abject performances last month.
Manchester United do not really exist, it was a conspiracy started to improve CIA and MI5 relations, a mere smoke screen to engage in empire building
http://www.debatabledecisions.com/tables According to this Liverpool and Arsenal were worst off, while Stoke were the team to most benefit from dodgy refereeing decisions. What I will say is Liverpool are 2nd bottom on both, so there maybe something in that, and also Stoke are top on both.
According to these statistics, City did get the worse end of the stick than United, they just raised their game to overcome the disadvatage. So surely they should be congratulated even more?
If it showed that Man Utd had benefited from incorrect decisions you would be claiming it is 100% correct.
What did you think of this goal Baz? I thought it was a cracker mate. [video=youtube;_Kn2IUqVi1w]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_Kn2IUqVi1w&feature=related[/video]
Well of course its just one mans opinion of the decisions so it would vary depending on who you ask, but all the tables like this show that no team gains or loses a massive amount over a season. If anyone thinks otherwise its because they want to.
