So on that basis can the Allams could be hauled over the coals by NB if he goes legal? Any evidence to support his corner?
Why would the Allam's risk being ridiculed anymore on this argument if they were in the wrong? Oh wait I forgot that anyone who does not agree with what is being posted on here is either niieve or easily led, like I have said numerous times on here unless you are either the Allam's,Barmby or Pearson you know nothing but you think you know something so that makes it right. Like I said I am neither niieve or easily led and I am quite capable of making my own mind up on the matter when I have all the FACTS to hand, as yet we only have one side of the argument.
You never will have all the facts about what happened, all you will have is different peoples' points of view from which you will have to make your own mind up.
If you ask Nick Barmby his version, then Adam Pearson his version and then the Allam's you would get two or three different replies so you still wouldn't know who was right. You would still only be able to guess who was telling the truth. The two replies being Nick and Adam having discussed the allegations together maybe. Sorry Strov missed your post so I am pretty much saying the same as you.
You don't think that if you were speaking to them in January and February, while all of this was going on and before things kicked off, you might be getting an accurate picture?
You would still have different versions so would still be a matter of who you believed though. I am not saying who is right or wrong.
We needed the manager to be able to manage, not be told it's Billy Sharp of you can **** off. Not all Nick's targets were wingers, we had a one month loan lined up for Fraizer Campbell until the ****er went and got back in the Mackems side.
Can I just ask - doesn't your first paragraph back up what Ehab's press release said, that funds were made available but NB didn't want Sharp? If so, what NB said in his interviews was wrong? Or am I mis-understanding?
Simple! It would have completely blown the wage structure. Sharp wanted Premier League wages, we weren't prepared to give him them. Tight knit teams with great spirit tend to get fcuked-up by kunts coming in on more than twice the salary of everyone else.
I just know he didn't want to sign Sharp and that money was not then made available for the players he did want to sign.
So it's your opinion and not a fact as you said it was. You even posted it to OLM who actually does know what deals were and weren't sanctioned.
Have you ever considered that maybe a couple of people on here are actually close to Barmby and DO know a bit more then the general posters. You are basically saying you believe everything that the Allam's say in their statements without question. If they say it then it must be right - oh what a simple uncomplicated world you live in.
