Barclays Premier League QPRâs Mark Hughes: FA should have waited to unveil Roy Hodgson QPR's Mark Hughes criticises the FA's decision to unveil Roy Hodgson as England boss before the Premier League's conclusion Share CommentsBy Kieran Beckles at Harlington 2:40pm UK, Friday 4 May, 2012 Roy Hodgson was unveiled as England manager at Wembley on TuesdayPA Photos Mark Hughes has criticised the Football Associationâs decision to name Roy Hodgson as England manager before the end of the Premier League season. Queens Park Rangers are above 18th-placed Bolton Wanderers on goal difference but the Trotters face Hodgsonâs West Bromich Albion side at the Reebok Stadium on Sunday. Hughes is hopeful Hodgson, who was unveiled as Fabio Capelloâs successor on Tuesday, will have his side fully motivated for their tie against Bolton â but the QPR boss feels the FA should have delayed the announcement. âItâs a great opportunity for Roy,â said Hughes. âIâm really pleased that heâs been given that opportunity. Heâs paid his dues and had a fantastic managerial career so Iâm sure heâll do exceptionally well. âI was a little bit disappointed that it came out this week. I felt people could have kept it under wraps until all the league games were out of the way and all the issues that need to be concluded were finalised. But that hasnât been the case and itâs come out early. âBut Iâd like to think, and I hope, that it wonât have an impact on West Bromâs performance [against Bolton Wanderers]. Iâd like to think theyâll work exceptionally hard for their manager who has done a fantastic job for them. âI donât know [if Bolton will have an advantage].â Bolton failed to to leapfrog QPR on Wednesday night after Owen Coyleâs side were comprehensively beaten 4-1 by Tottenham Hotspur. And Hughes says Tottenhamâs win gave his QPR squad a timely boost ahead of a must-win game against Stoke City at Loftus Road on Sunday. Asked if he watched the game, Hughes said: â[Yes] I put myself through that. I think everyone deal with the pressure in different ways. I felt I needed to sit through it, take it in and deal with it. âAs it happened, from our point of view, if Bolton had won the game it would have made it more difficult for us but that didnât happen. Weâve got somewhat of a lift as a consequence of that and helps to make Sunday a huge game for us.â
I was reluctant to say this on here before being accused of clutching at straw (which i am sure some may think) but I don't think it is a coincidence that of all the games they announced this just before Bolton play them. Why do it now and not two months ago or in two weeks time? Influence behind this is FA board member and Bolton Chairman Phil Gartside
I would back this view and 100% sure that its about the old boys club ... ****ing masons ... how many of joe public would like to see the entire FA strung up outside wembley ... Our game is in the hands of the corrupt worldwide ... time the fans took the game of the people back
I back it too! Garside probably fixed Clint's goal. We should refuse to go down if it is by Bolton being a point above us!
Whilst we don't know the truth of the matter, there's no denying that Garside has left himself wide open to such suspicion. Not bright. Credible boards usually consider the right time to go public with high profile announcements. This just makes both Garside and the FA look all the more inept, if not corrupt. Oh to rid ourselves of fat boys' sweetie chests like the FA and FIFA.
Does it undermine the conspiracy theory at all if someone points out that the announcement that Harry Redknapp wasn't going to be leaving Tottenham to take the England job was made the day before they played Bolton?
Actually thinking about, forget I said anything. Knowing that lot at the FA they probably hadn't realised the game had been rearranged for that day.