For one you seem to be the only set of fans debating whether the goal was deliberate. Everyone else is just admiring the technique.
Every wondergoal has an element of luck in it, that's no different to Cisse's. None of us deny he meant to shoot for goal though, it's not like it was a cross gone wrong (as has been the case for a few of Gerrards fantastic goals )
Perhaps because we are not prepared to merely accept the media opinion. If you look again at what we have said, you'll find that none of us have deprecated a stunning looking goal. Our ONLY argument is one of intention - as demonstrated by your original post. Now if that upsets you don't come here. It's really as simple as that. Or answer this question why have Newcastle always over-estimated their abilities until this year. Why do newcastle supporters have a liking for taking their shirts off in winter? Yes - they are just silly stereotypes too.
Cisses goal was a total hit and hope if you ask me. I would bet with him that he couldnt do that again if I gave him ten shots at it where as Suarez looked up saw where the keeper was and measured a lob. Cisses goal was still brilliant but you could tell even he was shocked it went in.
I don't like Liverpool anymore, almost to the point I want to claim Jimmy Nail is better than The Beatles.
Then you'd merely confirm the stereotype of Newcastle fans! As for not liking Liverpool - we don't really care.
not sure if its goal of the season havent reviewed them all yet but it is better than suarez's, away from home at stamford bridge for a start & against a world class keeper.
The Beatles are ****. Now that unpleasantness is out of the way I have seen the goal many times. Anyone who doubts he meant it has severe brain damage and should seek immediate medical help. Well that or for some reason very bitter for reasons only they know. He 100% meant it, Suarez' goal was better.......was it ****.
Alright, I'll go do that, then. Unlike you to fall on the side that isn't LFC, UIR. You probably think one of Wayne Rooney's penalties is better than Suarez's goal. '100%' meant it? Yeah, I'm '100%' sure he did...
I had seen it twice, on a laptop. I have now seen it in glorious HD on 42inches of screen. It was meant. Anyway, theres only like 5 of you on here who say it wasnt, the 5 people who lets be honest, disagree with everything none Liverpool related or that possibly overshadows something at Liverpool. Dont take my word for it, have a look around the site by all means.
I accept that you are biased about any opinion that emanates from this board. You are welcome to your opinion but don't castigate those who's opinion differs from yours. The ONLY person who knows if he was truly attempting that shot is Cisse and he's not saying. IF he did mean it he would have followed it with his eyes from the moment that it ledt his foot. Even you on your 40'' screen can see that his immediate reaction was to regain his midfield position. I therefore doubt his intention with some justification. What justification have you got apart from numbers? Nobody on this thread doubted that the goal was spectacular. So what's your problem - apart from the obvious?
Well 4deck you special ****tard, theres you and about 4 others who say it wasnt meant. The rest, well either we are all idiots or we are just not bitter ****s like yourself. We all know the answer there dont we, we are idiots as you are in no way bitter. The fact the worlds most bitter club has a tiny handful of fans who think their players goal was better says it all.
