How De Valera asked UK to smear IRA chief Sean Russell

As you have so well demonstrated, you don't have the faintest notion of what the IRA was in the 1930's.

If you did, then perhaps you might understand that modern Republicans have little time for those of the ultra right persuasion.

 

Far from it SM. Its very easy for me to talk about. Because I know about the subject. You on the other hand....know **** all.

 

Well there was also members of the IRA who blew up women and kids in Le Mons hotel after an almighty botch up, not to mention half of the other atrocities carried out in our name. To name some obscure IRA man trying to get guns off the Nazi's in the 1930's when half of the political elite of Europe were engaging with them is a bit of a pointless deflection.

 

My still deflecting what?

I don't have any problem. You obviously do insomuch as you have no understanding of the IRA in the 1930's.
You cannot blame me for your ignorance.

 

So i'll ask you once again...what organisation are you talking about?

 

Of course I have read the article.

You have told us you know the difference between the IRA of the 1930's and the PIRA of the post 1969 era. You evidently don't if you think that someone who holds Republican ideas in 2011 wouldn't be able to recognise and reconcile the difference between the two.

Its why I kept asking the question.

You not knowing the answer evidences that you don't know your arse from your elbow.

 

because you think I would be bothered about what a completely different organisation was doing in the 1930's.

 

my pish at what?

Look, you are evidently out of your depth here. just let it go.

You said the point of the thread was to get the rise out of me. Not to highlight what some defunct organisation was getting up to. Are you now changing your mind?

 

The Americans funded the Taliban, they must love Osama Bin Laden. The British were sitting down with Gadaffi a few months back having diplomatic meals and wine discussing oil deals, they must love killing the Libyan people. The British Royal Family were sympathetic to the Nazis also, the house of Windsor must still be Pro Fascist. The British Army have now been proven to have been in Collusion with Loyalist Paramilitary groups, all British Soldiers must be sympathetic to organisations which murdered people in cold blood.

This conversation is bloody pointless, you've linked one or two Irish Republicans to flirting with 'the enemy of our enemy' and are then trying to infer that all Irish Republicans are Nazi. Your argument is flawed and worse still boring.

 

And I am worse for entertaining it in the first place.

If you wanted to discuss it, then fine. I'll discuss it but go away and learn about it first.

 

My only reading what I want again what?
My talking nonsensical gibberish what?

Perhaps I am having difficulty in having a conversation with you because you pretended to know what you were talking about. Maybe I have found it difficult to shift the perameters to deal with someone who knows **** all.