What a great coincidence, some woman pops up on not606 to argue how correct she is on Wikipedia. Or some twat is bored on a Sat morning and started a 2nd account.
I notice that none of you posters have actually bothered to cite what is factually incorrect in the Wikipedia article. BTW, I am Jeanne Boleyn the actual Wikipedian editor not some bored t..t on a Saturday afternoon. I'm not hard to contact as I have provided my E-Mail and Twitter name on my Wikipedia User page. Sorry lads, my tit-flashing days are over. I came here not to read your witticisms but rather to challenge any one of you brave Apollos to come out and pinpoint which detail in the Wikipedia article is FACTUALLY INCORRECT and back up your allegation with a reliable source.
RebelBhoy and most republicans here will have no problem doing that for you. Have fun getting your head nipped
Well I'm waiting. What are you waiting for? And remember to back up your allegations with something other than your personal opinion. As for getting my head nipped well....Boleyn is part of my User name, no?
I would have replied sooner had I been aware this Forum existed. Discovered it by accident this fine morning. I see nobody has yet pointed out the errors in the Wikipedia article which can be edited by anyone, including yourselves.
I arrived here to pick up this thread after I noticed my own quotes from Wikipedia had been posted on this Forum. If you don't want people replying don't post their quotes.
Nobody is pretending to be me. If any of you were the least bit Internet-savvy, a quick Google search would have netted the results that I am indeed the Jeanne Boleyn whose quotes Dev Advocate posted on this Forum. It really shouldn't be so hard to connect the lines, eh?
So now that we've resolved my identity, will somebody kindly point out the inaccuracies in the Wikipedia article which this thread is really about? So far nobody is bothering to do so.
