Daffy_matth.

No. Only Mick and Syd can do so.

 

Disagree, some mods on this site would use it to ban users they don't like from their boards.

 

True but means the mods could use it to get rid of those troublemakers immediately without having to wait for Syd or Mick. Double edged sword if you ask me.

 

Exactly. Until Mods are picked for other reasons than being 'liked' they would simply abuse their power. The only way I think this would work was if mods were neutral and didn't support the team they were modding, even then it's not black and white.

Imagine if KPR could have banned people from the Liverpool board!!!

 

I agree, I think when most of the mods were chosen the site needed mods fast so a quick easy method was used to elect them. Now the site has the mods, I think when any leave or need to be replaced it would be good to choose based on the persons attitude.

 

and they are, we no longer have votes, I ask the opinion of the present mods and a collection of senior members, look at their posts and attitude.

 

That's all good then, I didn't realise that'd been changed.

 

How come KPR was made mod then as that was post vote democracy?

You do a job though, must be ****ing annoying for you at times!

 

The KPR mod thing was before the voting change as I recall.

 

Add Content

 

People voted for KPR?

 

Good riddance. Enough with threads about the slightest things that come to mind.

 

!. He had autism. Whats this got to do with anything? Nobody cares about that. He posted ****, none stop, every day and he also hurled around quite a bit of abuse himself.

2. Cyber Bullying. What the ****, some people are pathetic. In recent years I have heard stories of kids who go and shoot up schools or kill families or even themselves over some name calling online. Whos fault is it. The pathetic kids who take everything written to heart. **** sake grow a pair. In a normal day everyone gets abused at some point, they might not even know it. Cyber bullying is solved by using the ignore function. To choose not to use this means it was of no issue. End!

3. 5 good threads a day will always beat 50 **** threads.

Alan, have you always moaned like this? I dont remember it being the case. Comas has always been a **** though.

Seriously guys, its a ****ing forum, if you are concerned by some of the things on here then log off and dont come back. Compared to some of the **** on the Liverpool board and GC this board fine so lets discuss football like the site is intended for eh?

 

How do you think it will end on Monday, I'm even missing Corrie to watch it.

 

No idea at all.

Think we will play defensive and hit City on the break though. Just depends if City can get through. Everton game suggest yes.

 

City will probably bottle it to be honest, as they have done so many times this season when given the chance to capitalise. I see a 1-1 draw, therefore, probably making the title yours.

 

Even if we lose I think we will win the league. I really think City will drop points at Newcastle and United will win their last 2. That means even if City beat us but lose to Newcastle and we win our last 2 we win the League.

 

If we were to win the last two games, even a draw for City against Newcastle or QPR won't be good enough for them

 

1. Read this by Constrepe

2. I consider it to be cyber bullying and some of the abuse I have seen on here, I doubt they would use this foul language in the street or in the pub

3. We will see if the board really improves as some users have said or if it will remain dead just as it was before Matth arrived on the scene.

No, I have not always moaned but this Daffy saga made me speak up as those vulnerable users such as Matth get banned and some can get away with making all the derogatory terms they want and not get banned from it.

 

Time to move on now, the decision has been made.

I do feel for the new users that will join and they will have to put up with the close scrutiny of them being accused of being Matth.