Actually dumbass, we beat them 2-1 at the Emirates, and most people saw that as the best game of the entire tournament. But then again you are a dumb ass Chelsea fan, history and facts isn't one of your clubs strong points.
It's going to be really funny if you lose it big mouth (which you most likely will), won't be talking so cocky then, ;-). Oh, and we have a much more prestigious history than you will ever have, success that wasn't bought on Russian money, so **** off back to your own board you dumb chelski ****. As we chanted on Saturday, where were you when you were ****? Stupid Chelsea cock suckers all of a sudden started popping their heads when they got rich, and again talking big when their in the final, where are you loud mouths when your doing complete ****? That's a summary of your typical ****sea fan, quiet when all is bad, loud mouths when all is good, can't wait till you lose and get silent again.
And I repeat, doesn't change the fact we have a much more better successful history than you, so final, or no final, we're still the better and more successful club in London, is that too hard to understand you dumb c**t? and for all you're finals, you sit 6th in the league, haha, so in other words, you have turned into a sh!tty cup team.
Boy you're really angry aren't you . Would that be because we're in two cup finals while you're just about sitting in third? By the way, what does any of what you're saying have to do with the topic in hand?
Its because what I say has great meaning and power .. whereas what you say .... As for being in 2 finals, thats great, I can watch John Terry cry again for when you lose to Bayern and you can have the FA Cup, but you can watch us next season on Tuesdays and Wednesdays
Honest response Amy Some people have been far too bitter, I'm not saying we will win the CL because we could end up with nothing and we still haven't given up 4th place yet .
You never beat tham at there own game. You parked the bus and scored twice on the counter attack. Then got thrashed in the second leg without 1 shot lol.
My tupence since no one asked You're not going to agree. Never, ever, ever. If you beat Barcelona and get to the CL Final you've got to be delighted, regardless of the style. Anyone who says otherwise is a liar. That said I thought it was embarrassing that a team that costs as much as Chelsea played so negatively at home, not that they'll give a **** now they're in the final. Barcelona were the embarrassment in the second leg, they didn't learn anything about Chelsea from the first leg so went about the game the sameway, albeit with an extra man in attack, and got caught on the counter everytime Chelsea really went for it.
You'll make me look like a clown? That's rather funny. Your manager has been making your team look like a bunch of clowns for the last seven years and now it's one of the know it all fans who is gonna show me up? Had it not been for your fellow North London bottlers ridiculing themselves for over a decade and a half now, you wouldn't have anyone to pass the embarrassment on to. We both agree that anti-football is time wasting. We were hardly ever time wasting yesterday - we didn't have time to time waste, Cech was booked for simply going to collect the ball. There was as much dissent and foul play from each side, so we were as much of an anti-football side as Barcelona were and as much as you are, or Manchester United, or Liverpool is whenever you or they play. When a tackle gets the ball and is clean - whether from behind or from the front or from the side, it is allowed and I have seen it time and time again in the modern game. You only see it punished because more times than not the player attempting the challenge also catches the man. When was parking the bus exciting? Let's see - on Tuesday. And the reason is because two sides of complete opposite styles went against each other. That match was full of excitement and tension. So much in fact that even the yanks who tend not to give two hoots about football had whole topics on forums across the web discussing the match before, during and after. Then look at the Real Madrid vs Bayern Munich game. It become 2-1 and then from the 28th to the 120th is became as stale as Greggs bread. I repeat to you. Anti-football is NOT defensive football. If it is then so is attacking football. If you're going to assume that defending without a care for attacking is anti-football then attacking without a care for defending is also anti-football. But even if that wasn't the case, you would still be wrong as we did care about attacking yesterday as was proved by the two goals we scored. And against Barcelona we scored from all types of situations. We scored when the tie was level, we scored when we were behind in the tie and we scored when we were ahead in the tie. Over the two games we scored three goals. We outscored Barcelona and scored at both home and away. We scored more goals away. We were the first to score in the tie. We were the last to score in the tie. They scored no goals at the Bridge. And every goal we scored against them shat on theirs in terms of quality. And do you want me to bring you back to the game in 2009 at Stamford Bridge when they had one shot on target to our four whilst every other time we got into their box they would commit an offence? Barcelona playing anti-football there was it? A game that should have been about Essien's wonderstrike which was the goal of the tournament, turned out to be about the abysmal refereeing decisions.
You keep supporting the team simply because of their successful history mate, signifying the typical explanation for a glory hunter. The one thing that defines the Arsenal, Liverpool and Manchester United fanbase and which you all have in common. Arsenal fans are lucky that their club is based in the country's capital so they can use the "I support my local team therefore I am not a GHP" excuse which most United fans can not. I honestly do not understand your aggression towards us though, but I'm not interested in an explanation as I will probably get a load of baseless and childish abuse instead.
Chelsea did really well against Barca, and if it was Arsenal, I wouldn't care if it was pretty or not.
I don't support Arsenal because of their successful history, it's just that I'm lucky the team I do happen to support has been a very successful team based on actual hard work, unlike your sh!tty team who needed huge amounts of money and buying a whole team for success. It's such an irony that a Chelsea fan is also talking about 'glory-hunting' considering all the new Chelsea fans who came on your wagon once the money started rolling in. And btw, Arsenal haven't won anything in 7 seasons, now why the f--k would I be support such a team if I was a glory hunter...You aren't very bright are you? Not surprising, don't take it hard, most Chelsea fans generally aren't so bright when it comes to arguing football. But you're a very typical Chelsea fan, running your mouth on the Arsenal board when Chelsea are doing good, where were you when you were sh!t? Same place you'll be after you lose, going all quiet and silent. Enjoy your finals, cause that's all you've become, a cup team.
Job done mate, but it seems like luck gets no credit whatsoever, it was a shameful concession to not play football of any kind though when you spend that kind of money on a team you send them out to defend 15 yards of pitch for 90 minutes in the biggest semi showpiece of the year. Yep, football a results driven game for sure. Thats all that matters I guess. I tell you what though Drogs, noone will be remembering this chelsea team that is failry certain Arsenal went to the Nou and didnt play like that, Liverpool went there and didnt play like that, United went there and didnt play like that. Arsenal were very unlucky with the RvP sending off, that was dodgy, I thought they had Barca's number till that point.
Arsenal87 - Yurilly is a plum. He side stepped my pints and went off on some stupid tangent Anti football is a plethora of things as I have now said umpteen times - parking the bus is part of it. PISKIE - thats your opinion and you are welcome to it, thankfully many fans do not agree. Drogs - because someone agrees with YOU they are talking sense Trilogy - you are a big fool ! I suggest you get your facts right before you try to argue with your superiors. Barca bossed possession in our 2-1 like they always do, but, for a team you CLAIM parked the bus, we had 13 goal attempts to their 11, we both had 5 on target. Keep your little mouth quiet fool.
climb out sunshine, they all lost against Barca, we didn't . I could not care less if you think we played anti football, we are in the final for the upteenth time. hothead, he shares the opinion of most that we did well to get through, of course I'm going to ****ing agree you gimp! Anti football is a term invented by gooners who think Arsenal invented football. It wasn't pretty football, but it certainly wasn't anti football.
As i said - Chelsea actually played a similar game to Arsenal at the Nou Camp - due to luck and nothing else Chelsea won and Arsenal lost. Its really that simple. At home though I would have expected Chelsea to play more football - in the end it did not matter because Barca missed their chances.
