Thats weird because most times I've been in court or seen people get sentenced in court it has been by a judge who is all to happy to give you his name. Not every court case consists of a jury you know. As MrT said McCoist should never have had the outburst but the fact you lot are calling him every name under the sun is ****ing hilarious considering only a few weeks ago lennon had what? 3 appointments with the SFA over outbursts? and hes such an angel right enough. The people making these threads are fannys but yous passing judgement on McCoist is still some of the ****ing funniest **** I've ever read.
Yet when Rangers fans pass judgement on Lennon it's entirely justified? Away and rape some kids in the bath MD. You're a ****ing idiot.
It's hilarious because when rangers fans pass judgement on Lennon yous defend him. I think you'll be hard pressed finding a rangers fan on here who will defend those comments, everyone knows fine well he took the biscuit. So away and sort your wee pal out I'm sure you and ER are gagging for a good shagging.
So, when's Ally getting hauled up? This is the umpteenth time he's said something which insinuates the SFA are biased or conspiring against his team this season. Times he's been pulled up for it? Nada, ****-all, zero. Just as well he didn't call a decision "criminal", eh?
Certain fans do defend Lennon, not all, a fact which has escaped you. You're such a blinkered moron that you trot out the "yous defend him" retort. There are PLENTY of Rangers fans out there defending McCoist. The fact that you dragged Lennon into it proves that you've actually got no counter argument just a bunch of statements and half-truths. No more can Rangers fans claim to have any "dignity" No more can Rangers fans claim to have "respect" for the game in Scotland, the SFA and it's staff No more can Rangers fans claim that terrorism is a Celtic FC problem and an Irish Catholic problem. All your little Linus blankets are being snatched away and you don't know how to deal with it.
When was his outburst? How long does it take for him to get chinned? I have no doubt he will get pulled up for it and, given the precedent set, rightly so.
We'll as far as I've seen that's the first and I actually think he deserves to be hauled up and serve a ban for his comments. Even if these other things you say have been said (and I'm not saying they haven't) then I wouldn't argue with you but I seriously doubt these interviews you speak of are anywhere near the rage Lennon has been showing or Ally showed in the one we are talking about. Personally I can't understand what makes them act like fannys in front of a nation but there you go.
I don't see your point. The rules as agreed by clubs including Rangers were that the panels for these disciplinary committees should be anonymous. As are juries in criminal cases. Do you deny this? The rest is just bullshit whataboutery and I suspect you know it.
Spending too much time with Dev, feel free to also bite my ****e Venom you are a broken record. Typical ****er is what you are when you consistently paint everyone with the same brush. You claimed every guilty person in a court is decided anonymously, It's just not true and is hardly ever the case its your lack of knowledge on how a court actually works that got you here. No its not bullshit its just complete bias shown by you lot when you can't even see the similarities between McCoists outburst and some of Lennons.
The truth should be shouted from the rooftops; loudly and repeatedly so that every **** can get the message: Rangers are ****ed and there is hee haw you lot can do about it. DIE RANGERS DIE
Ah, so my argument is so weak that you can't be bothered taking the time to criticise it properly. That's just the mewl of the **** who knows he has no real reply. "I'm pyoor too clever to even reply to that wan so ah am". Fanny.
No I didn't claim every guilty person is decided anonymously. I claimed jurors were anonymous. Which they are. Either way that doesn't detract from the point (which clearly went miles over you head) - it is "normal" that anonymity within a court setting exists and it is not the right of the "defendent" to demand the anonymity (of jurors or the SFA disciplinary panel) be removed. It is even more preposterous in the case of Rangers as they signed up for the rules which determined the procedure last year! It's ironic that you slag off Venom for painting everyone with the same brush then in the next breath do the exact same thing. Regardless, your "point" was pure whataboutery, no more no less.
the panel was "supposedly impartial" - what does that insinuate? Still he didn't call a ref's decision "criminal", eh? "The rules are not being applied fairly, all we want is for the rules to be applied evenly" regarding Aluko before he went on to whitaboot about a couple of incidents in Celtic games. There's two instances where he's stated that the SFA are biased against his team. No ban. Fat **** will be in the dugout on Sunday after he insisted private individuals be named when he knew their ****ing names - he also knew what would happen when they were named if the club painted these guys as pariahs. If Lennon uttered any of these things, you lot would be beeling and Neil would be up in front of a panel. I'm betting he wouldn't ask for them to be named publicly, though
I have a reply, just not the energy to explain it to a dumb **** that's angry enough to resort to petty name calling. Read your post again. See what you've done and apologise.
Well McCoist did utter them and 'you lot' are beeling. If Lennon had uttered them 'you lot' would be defending him. Them's the breaks for both lots of fans.
So you admit that your comparison was completely off then I suppose? Whats funny about you claiming I do the exact same thing is you didn't even acknowledge the main point of that sentence so the "your lot" part of that sentence just proves it, can't believe you didn't notice that.
i suppose you could argue that actual sentencing is not anonymous - a judge sentences, a jury delivers verdict. weirdly the sfa are a little upside down here - nimmo did the verdict and the anonymous panel sentenced but thats all it is - a wee bit mixed up - the principal (principle? i never get it right..) is sound imo and what difference does it make?
No. Because it wasn't even slightly off. Jurors are anonymous. The disciplinary panel was anonymous. Which part of that comparison falls down? I did notice it. It still didn't constitute a point worthy of rebuttal as it was, is and will remain nothing but whataboutery. Just to clarify, we're discussing Ally McCoist here and your point consists of 'Neil Lennon said something bad too - condemn him, condemn him now'
