carroll dive hahahaahhahahahahahhahahahahhahahahahahhahha RATHER DIVE THEN SCORE HAHAHAHHAA ****ING **** PLAYER HAHAHAHHAHA
You have 10 more points than you should have thanks to beneficial decisions. Now then, lets discuss shall we?
no one complains against any decision in any match, when its against us you never hear about it again........... but **** me when united get a so call decision you never hear the end of it
Anyone else think its time they take retrospective action and ban divers ?? Im thinking a 2 match ban if you get caught; i know that means we'd never be able to play young but its the only way to erradicate this problem. You can say its harsh but at the end of the day it can cost teams; think about it, im not saying QPR would have done any better against us with 11 men and us not being a goal up but theres a chance they could have and decisions like these can really affect teams.
Anyone watching the Chelsea v Spurs game, given a goal that didn't cross the line. Where are the conspiracy theories? Here's mine Chelsea aren't good enough for anyone to think they are cheating.
But there was contact so unless you can somehow work out exactly how much force was used how can you be sure if it was a dive or not.
Get his name right before you criticise him. There was alot more contact in the Helguson one than both of Young's put together.
No, using the fair play table posted on todays Match thread. You have 10 points more than they think you should have. We have 3 less than we should have, such is the awful quality of referees.
I'm not sure how fair play dictates how many points you should have nor how anyone would be able to calculate such a statistic with any accuracy anyway.