You had a catholic in 1873? Well I suppose that makes up for the 50 odd years where Rangers operated a sectarian signing policy.
Really, Dev? Perhaps you just weren't good enough. Now why did Big Jock only get offered the pools gig?
He managed our club for years. Guided us through the most successful period in our history. a figure revered in and around the club. What is your point.
Why was he only offered a job running the pools after such a dignified period? Surely a position on the board would've been more becoming of the gentleman?
what a pile of ****in ****e how ****in boring some of you ****s ****e like this kills this bored (sic)
Why do you think it was BH? Whilst you are at it, could you answer my other question about what exactly you meant by "no problem" at the advent of Hibs?
So what happended to him after he was Celtic manager? Fukn disgrace... Celtic should be ashamed. One of the greatest managers scotland has ever had and celtic treated him in a questionable manner. If you dont know you aer the most deluded celtic fan i know...
I'm sorry, but I asked the question. Answering questions with a question is just mundane (becoming with your personality) stuff. Answer it.
Honestly? I gave you the benefit of the doubt as you seemed to be fairly reasonable but unfortunately you are now indulging in one of the most laughable conspiracy theories in Scottish Football. Why did the Kellys and the Whites not want Jock on the board? Hmm, let me think about that. ****ing laughable But back to the point, does the signing of a few Cathloics over a a 40 year period make up for 50 years of bigotry?
Fine BH, I'll take it from that, that you have no answer. You are absolutely full of ****. If you don't have the intelligence to see your argument through, don't start it. Just you keep on backtracking, or hows about changing the subject altogether. What a pussy
yeh - why didnt they want him on the board? why did you give him the pools director? im not indulging in anything. is it cos "he knew"? is it cos he was of different persuasion? educate me. how far do we want go back here? 50years? 100years? 200years? the persecution picture changes as we step back in time.
I'm sorry, which part of the reply didn't you get? I asked a question, answer it, or, does the truth cut a bit close to the argument?
Why did Jock not get a position on the Celtic Board despite leading them to European glory? It's not a hard question, even for you, Webel Bhoy.
Rangers have had Catholic players on their books since before you were even incepted. So your point is?
Were you on the Celtic board at the time they offered Jock the job on the pools? If not then you do not know why he was not given a seat on the board, BUT you already think you know why, so anything I say will not be taken on board. You have already made your mind up why he never got a seat otherwise why did you ask?
