bald people haven't been an oppressed community for the last 842 years. When you talk of Fenians, you mean irish Catholics. You don't mean members of the Fenian brotherhood from 150 years ago.
Coming from a Cork street urchin. Di Canio? The picture in the DR of one of YOUR fans making the monkey jesture at Diouf? You're a cawk
http://www.scotzine.com/2011/02/racist-celtic-fan-targeted-rangers-el-hadji-diouf/ Oh dear, Declan, oh dear.
Is there sustained and deliberate campaign to denigrate bald people? what is the historical context for this discrimination? Are they discriminated against in real terms for their baldness? and how is that demonstrated?
Ma old man used to always tell me not to trust a guy wae a moustache....as they have something to hide.
My point, is in relation to your statement about "our support" ridding ourselves of its allegedly "racist" element, which you made. But, I'm sure it will be put down to "Juan Ghuy"
Monaco, look at it this way. Catholic women are oppressed. They might like having sex, but due to religious reasons, the bloke won't wear a dirty harry. She might not want kids, but it's tough luck on her. Condom's stop AIDS, why are they against them?
The Catholic method for preventing the spread of sexually transmitted diseases is more effective than condoms.
Eh? You do realise that when a penis enters a vagina that it's already spreading? Or do you just do tit ****s?
Why people judge people from 842 years ago is beyond me to be honest. 40 years ago smoking was good for you! Were Prods not oppressed years ago too? The Huguenots, a perfect example.
Because you are a sub human species. do you think that that guy is representative of the wider Celtic support?
