Haha no, was only joking! Don't really have a problem with North East teams. Was expecting a few more bites though by the time I got home from work!
Here is another stat thats missing UTD 19 titles Liverpool 18 titles Now thats the only stat thats worth anything
to you yes because the othes dont put you top. Ahh, we can all use stats as much as we like, we know United were nowhere near as successful as Liverpool until the prem came along, are we surprised that stats show overall Liverpool have taken more points. But for mancs and a chav to throw a fit because of this is pathetic, Berb cannot bring himself to see UNited are far from hte best team in England over a century, not evn second since late 90's its a different story, who cares, LFC greatest of all time for me, when we were top it was top of europe, not maybe, definately, but I would se it that way but I wont bemaon a manc seeing it their way but please stop crying because the stats tell the truth, as in, liverpool have ammased more points overall, take it as you will, number of games played ect, well that may not be the case if united managed to get relegated less then it may have been more even
This shoulod be good. Berb, define 'past' for me please. Then you might like to explain why every football discussion on the liverpool forum with the word united in it has to end with '19 titles' as some sort of debate ender when titles are not being discussed?
This is fantastic, worthy of another sig, but mine is too long already and about to be deleted anyway. I looked up the dictionary, oxford, your definition is a little bit off the mark. If referenced in the historical context, when you further refine the context it can be yesterday last week last year and so on. Even top side is so ambiguous. We were The Top Side, you were one of the top sides and never the best team in europe for a spell at all, here comes 'someone with CL stats', thats a differnece right there without even going into history even though technically, everything you bleat on about is actually history! You do try but I reckon if your not outdoors when you're thinking you may overheat and catch fire, living in a cardboard box n'all that aint good my friend
What a ****ing thicko. You're 7th - present We're the current league champions - present You've been blabbering on about being the best team in Europe at one time - past So even though we won the domestic title and the Champions League in the same season (twice) we have never been the top side in Europe? By the way, it's "you're" for "you are", not "your".
typo biatch, but as you're resorting to pointing that out, deperationnnnnnnnn! Sweet This is not about current league position This is not about current champions You havre no idea what 'past' means You cannot keep track of more than 1 previous post and your mind resets, hence the incoherent rubbish and 1 liners. In the context of the OPs point, past comes into it totally and utterly, cant you unerstand that, seriously? C'mon, are you really that thick or are you pulling my leg here. Lastly yeah, you had yer spell in europe and had yer chance to make hte team legends in World football Liverpool were so good players still sign for us 30 years later based on that Who were united in 1990, noone and that is why history does not matter eh?
They always lose track get lost and generally put forward a terrible argument, no corporate strategy or mensa meetings for this lad me thinks
In theroy ****brick, we are still one of the best European teams having won the CL 5 times. Until someone beats that (and let's face it, it won't be you for a long time) we will still be one of the best European sides whether we are in the competition or not. You are an averag Eurpoean side because you have won th etrophy 3 times - See the difference here? It must really grate on you because even though we're not in it and haven't been for a few years now, you still haven't won it as many times as us let alone more? Do you see what I'm saying here? I want to make it perfectly clear for your that in Europe, LFC are one of the best sides where as Utd are just an average side who keep getting raped by the same team over and over again. I said on a seperate thread, the satisfying thing is knowing that SAF will go to his grave knowing there is one tournament he never managed to win more than LFC - The Holy Grail. If you want to know who a top manager was, Bob Paisley, 3 CL trophies one manage won as many as you have in the history of your club. this is not history, this is a modern day statistic, and it is great!
Sweet Irony. You call one of ours a glory hunter for supporting his team through the lean years when theres not much glory to hunt in our case and throw a hissy fit because he pointed out the fact that Utd were nothing more than a good cup side pre Fergie.
