Ah yes but we are not talking about something with no evidence. Everything around us is evidence that we exist - all we are debating is how that came to pass. Some say God, some say we always have. Neither argument has any evidence to support it. Science actually has nothing to do with it.
We don't know how the universe was created at the moment, so there's no reason to believe that any of the current explanations are true, is there? If I were to say that it was done by me, would you give that the same consideration that you give to the suggestion that god did it?
No, it was on the Arsenal board. Either that or god just created it and made it look much older than it actually is.
All am gonna say is: God is real, if your an atheist, hang yourself An don;t ****ing ask me to explain anything, i cant be bothered
No - I am not arguing that God exists because we cant prove he does not. I am saying that God is the rationale that some (many) people use to explain an unanswered question. It's a belief. It is also a belief to say we always existed. Moving away from God for a second; there are many examples of ancient sites found across the world where we have no clue as to who built them. All we have is evidence for their existence. Your argument suggests that it is ok to believe they were always there and no one built them.
No, only prophets and priests can be *****s As for the 'bad God' idea, I believe Norse mythology subscribed to that theory.
So you believe in anything that can't be disproved? That's ludicrous. We know that buildings get built, as we have evidence to prove it. We don't know that universes get built.
For ****s sake Jip, is this on purpose, have you read the last ****ing line of my post?! for ****s sake
