or, when looked at through my timoscope, a deceitful cheating **** trying to obfuscate his way out of being under scrutiny.
Of course you do. Regrdless, Rangers may win the dispute, they may not. Thos who do know the facts (the tax lawyers) will sort it out.
Trevor the only thing dying is your disgusting cheating football club , 10 sleeps to Ibrox!!! , can't wait to see and feel the pain of your punters as we knock 3/4 past you to win the league . It's going to be the best party ever seen
better than our party at the pigdome when you ripped your own seats out to throw at our players? (cue harry not to mention above seat throwing comment but to counter it with bad rangers fans behavior)
Losing a tax dispute does not equal cheating. Tax disputes are won and lost all the time where there has been no breaking of tax law/regulations. Cheating, I may remind you, is a deliberate act. If Rangers lose the dispute becaue they can be shown to have deliberately flouted tax regulation, then that would be cheating. No sane person would deny that. Well, Rangers fans as rabid as you are for RFC would probably still deny it. As I've said before on this forum, if that were the case I would hope and expect for prosecutions to follow that scenario. Your desperate need for cheating to be the case does make it so. Turn your rabidity down several notches and leave it to those who have the facts - the tax lawyers. Not worth commenting any more on this until the result of the tribunal is known. Otherwise it's little more than trading words with rabid desperados.
