The Royal Family

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Ciaran

Ciaran

Going for 55
Jun 20, 2011
44,783
30,827
113
Waste of money?




Ps. Don't give me any bollocks about tourism btw, France gets far more tourists than Britain and they had their Royals heads off centuries ago.
 
Don't mind them really, but id prefer an opt in scheme for the civil list instead of tax money just being given to them
 
Mind The Step said:
Don't mind them really, but id prefer an opt in scheme for the civil list instead of tax money just being given to them
Click to expand...

The dumbasses in England and Rangers fans in Scotland and Merdo's of the Irish north would rather spend money on the Royals than hospitals, teachers etc. then sit around complaining about how ****e everything is.
 
Opt in then

Is take my 60p out and Trev can stick his winnings from Clonmel in

Everyone is happy
 
Go Go Yellowscreen said:
The dumbasses in England and Rangers fans in Scotland and Merdo's of the Irish north would rather spend money on the Royals than hospitals, teachers etc. then sit around complaining about how ****e everything is.
Click to expand...

We don't need more hospitals. If anything, we have too many! More Royal functions boost morale if anything.

GSTQ
 
Medro Pendes:2433554 said:
Go Go Yellowscreen said:
The dumbasses in England and Rangers fans in Scotland and Merdo's of the Irish north would rather spend money on the Royals than hospitals, teachers etc. then sit around complaining about how ****e everything is.
Click to expand...

We don't need more hospitals. If anything, we have too many! More Royal functions boost morale if anything.

GSTQ
Click to expand...

Besides, rangers are paying for the hospitals
 
The problem is, if you remove the Royal Family, then you'll probably end up with a President as an alternative to the monarch.
It won't be any cheaper.

There are other reasons to remove the monarchy, but finances isn't one of them, in my opinion.
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
The problem is, if you remove the Royal Family, then you'll probably end up with a President as an alternative to the monarch.
It won't be any cheaper.

There are other reasons to remove the monarchy, but finances isn't one of them, in my opinion.
Click to expand...

Why would we have to have a President?
 
PleaseNotPoll said:
The problem is, if you remove the Royal Family, then you'll probably end up with a President as an alternative to the monarch.
It won't be any cheaper.

There are other reasons to remove the monarchy, but finances isn't one of them, in my opinion.
Click to expand...

One President would cost the same as several Royals?

Good one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back