You did infer it. If you don't think you did, then you're clearly not right in the napper. Why would the guy belting that bitch affect him seeing his kids? It was her he belted, not them, ya big soft pussy. I await your response, eagerly.
What part of what I said suggested any opinion on whether he was in the right or wrong to hit her? I clearly stated why I thought he was an idiot, but you read something into my comment that wasn't there because you were expecting someone to be outraged by his actions. If you don't understand why a man hitting the mother of his kids can negatively affect the likelyhood of him seeing them, then you're dumber than you sound.
Are you for real, fella? Seriously, go back to the post you did originally, read it again, slowly, then come back to me. How do you know she's the mother of his kids? How do you know she's his wife? How do you know they're his kids? Why would him hitting her matter? He didn't hit the children, just the mouthy whore who wouldn't let him take the ps3. The guy deserves a ****ing medal imo, and you deserve a straight jacket. Ya ****ing eejit.
I think that you need to, actually. I said that he was an idiot, that he'd struggle to get access to his kids and that it wasn't worth it for a Playstation and a TV. You assumed the rest. I don't know that she's the mother of his kids, which is why I put "presumably" in my comment. He's her husband, as it says in the clip's title, so it's natural to think that she's his wife, isn't it? Domestic violence can be used as a reason to block or restrict access to kids, even if it doesn't involve the children directly. I'd suggest that you look it up, but you're probably too dense to manage it.
hmm At first I sided with the guy.But now I've masturbated and feel more relaxed in my post masturbatory haze. I now think they were both wrong. She was looking for a fight and he was dumb enough to fall for it. The only innocent parties here are the dog and the kids. I suggest you all go and masturbate and then report back with a clear mind.
Still failing to understand that I haven't offered a moral opinion about the clip? Why am I not surprised? You couldn't even read the title.
