The downfall of the house of Leggo

Cossy · Mar 1, 2012

I'm a bit shocked about ****o's column today. I mean, at long last, he might actually have a point. That in Itself makes it an exclusive.

What was that saying about monkeys, typewriters and Shakespeare?

Go G YellowScreen · Mar 1, 2012

He really has an unhealthy hatred of Speirs.

How much does it grind his guts that Speirs is earning hundreds of pounds per week writing for the Herald and reguarly appearing on telly and radio? And there's old Leggo struggling to get by on benefits.

AP: Password Mong · Mar 1, 2012

Not very interestingly, I saw "Odious Creep" yesterday evening at Buchanan St underground station. To be honest I couldn't see whether he was sympathising with *****philes or plotting against Rangers at the time (but he probably was).

rogueleader · Mar 1, 2012

AP'sLostPasswordShame said: ↑

Not very interestingly, I saw "Odious Creep" yesterday evening at Buchanan St underground station. To be honest I couldn't see whether he was sympathising with *****philes or plotting against Rangers at the time (but he probably was).
Click to expand...

Ive begun to think the most likely scenario is that he spends much of his time dreaming up things david leggat would say, because its now becoming clear to me that graham spiers is david leggat, and uses leggoland for his own crafty self-promotion.

No ?........well , has anyone ever seen them in the same place at the same time ?

Go G YellowScreen · Mar 2, 2012

Friday, 2 March 2012

AN OPEN LETTER TO DAVID MURRAY

DEAR DAVID,

Forgive my lack of formality, but there are too many people out there who would lynch me were I to address you by the title bestowed upon you by Her Majesty.

Perhaps a combination of being in your Murray Group’s Edinburgh headquarters, your hideaway estate in Perthshire or your Chateaux with its vineyards in France, has dulled your antenna to what is being thought and said about you during what I should like to call the Whyte Scandal.

Here is a man, Craig Whyte, who you appeared to be in an awful hurry to seal the deal with, to such an extent that you took just a quid for Rangers from a trickster and con artist who in a few short months has dragged the good name of Rangers into the gutter.

Can you doubt now that you were duped? Conned? Taken for a ride? Made a mug of by an arch conman and trickster?

Made to be a real life Scottish version of Doyle Lonnegan, the Richard Shaw character ripped off by Paul Newman and Robert Redford in the Sting?

Of course admitting that would be a blow to your ego. Of course it is hard to admit to being taken for a mug. But that is the truth, isn’t it?

Your answer must surely be self evident.

Unless there were even darker, more sinister and more dangerous external forces at work.

Were there?

But here is another question. A more obvious one, but possibly just as hard for you to answer. And for Lloyds Bank to answer. Just how due and how diligent was the due diligence which you insisted you conducted on Craig Whyte?

For on the day the disastrous deal was done, one national newspaper carried a story which revealed that Whyte had been banned from being a director for seven years.

Yet your due diligence and the due diligence carried out by Lloyds Bank failed to spot this.

The newspaper in question was Britain’s biggest selling quality paper, the Daily Telegraph, where your good friend, Rangers supporter, Jeff Randall, is the Business Editor. Though the story was not his, as it happens.

How did you due diligence miss this? How did Lloyds Bank’s diligence miss this?

I pair you – or at least the Murray Group – and Lloyds together, as received wisdom has it that during the period from when Whyte first “marked” you and declared an interest in Rangers, Lloyds were virtually running, not just Rangers, but your whole empire.

But we are, where we are!

So David, just what are you going to DO about it?

Nothing is not an option!

A senior source told me that you had intended to make a statement last week, but agreed to a request from Duff and Phelps to keep your counsel until after they had spoken to you.

After they visited you a week ago all you did was release an anonymous statement saying you had no idea that Whyte had procured the Â£24.4m from Ticketus, adding you had no knowledge of on what basis managed to do that.

Which poses the next question.

Why didn’t you know?

And then another one.

Did Lloyds know? And didn't tell you?

Conman Whyte sold the assets of a company which you owned, and continued to own for the following month, he did it right under your nose and you didn’t notice.

That, dear David, is “Find The Lady” as high art. The “Three Card Trick” perfected beyond recognition.

Now the trick for you is to put things right. To challenge the legality of the deal in the Court of Session. Or in an English High Court if that is possible and if it increases your chances of winning.

Remember that Whyte would have to take the oath and give evidence. Evidence as to where he got the money from at the outset to satisfy you he had the funds to run Rangers.

To emphasise, where did he get the original funds - that is before his Ticketus deal - to satisfy you he was a person of substance?

If legally challenged by you, would any court believe Whyte, a man whose evidence has been branded as wholly unreliable by a judge?

Like all seriously rich guys, David, you like to think of yourself as a winner. Well you are on a winner there.

In the meantime, the Whyte Scandal has left Rangers tottering and you cannot leave them in that state. You are just as responsible for the Whyte Scandal as the conman is, the difference being your responsibility is of the moral variety.

Dig deep, David. There is a website out there where money is being pledged to take Rangers forward when and IF they come out of administration. It is called saverangers.com

I am sure you have heard of it and of the fact that it has now broken through the Â£10m barrier. That is astonishing and shows just how many people care about Rangers and who are willing to shell out.

So after you have read this – and I know you do read me most days, or have your attention drawn to me by a surviving and still ‘andy press lacky whenever I write about you as I did on April 19 and 20 – check out the site.

See what the running total is and.....

MATCH IT!

That’s right! Let your contribution double the headline figure when you check it out. By the time you read this the fund could be touching Â£12m. If it is, then do the right thing and do even more than match it.

Round it up to Â£25m.

If you do, then when I write my next open letter to you, it will be a thank you one on behalf of all Rangers supporters and I’ll be pleased to restore formality in terms of address and acknowledge the fact that you have been honoured by Her Majesty.

As Aye

DAVID

……….
AND……

HERE’S a wee insight into the way newspapers work. Sometimes, when a staffer or designated freelance has not written a story, the byline used is what’s called a “house name”

Years ago, on successive days, a tabloid had the same “house name” on a golf tournament in America, a tennis tournament in France, and a Test match in Australia. We all hooted at the thought of the expenses involved. And the fact that travel arrangements must have been made, not by Thomas Cook, but by HG Wells.

At the Herald, the “house name” on sports stories is Martin McMillan. And that is the one they used on Thursday morning at the top of the Slovenia-Scotland match report.

For the Herald, as regular readers know, did not send a reporter to report on the Scotland game.

That was bad enough, but the Herald "cheated" their readers even more by producing what's known in the old inky trade as a "dateline byline."

In other words the Herald, once a respected paper of record, claimed the report was "From Martin McMillan in Koper."

The wider internal issue or the ailing paper means it will now be interesting to see how the man who bought in Odious Creep for Â£500 a column to write his pisspoor stuff in the Sunday Herald, explains to unhappy underlings how his decision meant the Herald could not afford to send someone with Scotland.

It will also be interesting to watch the Sunday Herald sales, already down to 29,000 and falling, now that self confessed *****phile sympathiser Odious Creep is polluting the paper’s pages.

As it happens, in a week more people read LeggoLand – including every sports writer in Scotland and beyond, plus David Murray – than read the latest paper to be jinxed by Odious Creep, the failing, flagging, falling Sunday Herald.

PIP! PIP!

PS – The Herald match report was written by the excellent Ronnie Esplin, who was with Scotland in Slovenia on duty for the Press Association.
Click to expand...

Phew! He must have been up all night writing that!

Â£500 per column for Speirs. Ouch!

VenomPD · Mar 2, 2012

As it happens, in a week more people read LeggoLand – including every sports writer in Scotland and beyond, plus David Murray – than read the latest paper to be jinxed by Odious Creep, the failing, flagging, falling Sunday Herald.
Click to expand...

Here is the Fantasy World Leggo lives in:

please log in to view this image

DevAdvocate · Mar 3, 2012

[h=2]Saturday, 3 March 2012[/h][h=3]WHERE DOES CRAIG WHYTE GET HIS MILLIONAIRE LIFESTYLE MONEY FROM?[/h]
JUST where does Craig Whyte get the money he needs to fund his jet set multi millionaire lifestyle?

It is, I am sure you will all agree, a fair and pertinent question. Yet conman Whyte has so far refused to answer any questions regarding what we will call his “connections.”

It takes an awful lot of money to buy a Castle in the Highlands. Even more to buy a swish flat in London’s Belgravia and also stay in a suite in Mayfair’s Connaught Hotel? And even more again to have a harbour side apartment in that billionaires tax haven of Monaco.

Monte Carlo AND BUST?

So just how does Whyte pay for it all? After all, he had all three properties and lived life in the fast and extremely expensive lane long before he took control of Rangers and got his paws on the club’s money. So we know the missing millions from Ibrox have not funded his lifestyle completely.

Yet every company he has ever been involved with has either made only a modest profit, or more regularly, gone bust owing money.

He has no visible means to support his lifestyle.

So where has all of Craig Whyte’s money come from? To whom is he connected?

Usually when someone like Whyte jets around the world living it up like a lord, with no visible means to support that lavish lifestyle, alarm bells go off among various authorities, some of them spooky, and he becomes a person who interests them.

These people want to know just where the money is coming from and they watch the person who interests them like a hawk to discover who he meets and talks with in order to discover just who he is connected to.

I am just wondering if, when the reporters and photographers who tracked Craig Whyte to his Monaco lair and staked him out there, ever had the feeling there were other eyes on their man? That Craig Whyte was being watched by someone else.

Old hacks, in particular street savvy snappers, are particularly good at picking this sort of thing up.

Sooner or later that question will be answered and the organisations who consider Craig Whyte to be a person who interests them, will or will not make a move against him, depending on what evidence, photographic , documentary and otherwise, they compile.

For the moment, the question which remains in the public domain is, just where does Craig Whyte get the cash to support his lavish lifestyle?

Whyte, it would seem, was able to provide proof of substantial funds to David Murray even before the Â£24.4M from Ticketus went into his client account at London lawyers Collyer Bristow on April 7th.

We now know Collyer Bristow are waiting for the verdict on a Â£50M fraud action against them, on April 7[SUP]th[/SUP].

But do they know where their senior lawyer, the man appointed by Craig Whyte to be Rangers company secretary, Gary Withey, is?

Withey seems to have vanished off the face of the earth. Is he on he run? In hiding? I think we should be told.

What we do know about the Whyte cash is that got Â£24.4M of it from Ticketus.

Though it still remains a mystery how he pulled off that con trick on the company and it also remains a mystery how and where he got the original money to show to David Murray as proof of substance, before the Ticketus dodgy deal.

Whyte’s people told media men to call him a billionaire. That’s a whole lot of money. More than David Murray, even in his milk and honey years was worth. That’s the Dermot Desmond class of wealth.

Whyte's wealth came -again this was Whyte’s people talking - from taking over ailing companies, turning them around then selling at a huge profit, we were told. That was the official line from the Craig Whyte camp.

Yet, on the day after he took over Rangers, when Craig Whyte was asked to give a few examples of this, he refused and changed the subject. He could not say where he got his money from.

Therefore, to the question I posed for Whyte last month, regarding him showing us the money when it came to the missing cash from Rangers, I once again add the more far reaching and perhaps even more pertinent and pointed one.

Just where does Craig Whyte get the money which supports his multi millionaire lifestyle?

It is an interesting question and it may soon be posed to Craig Whyte by some of the people who find him such an interesting person.

…………AND
…………..

STEWART REGAN should be very careful when his Scottish Football Association launch their probe into allegations made by 86-year-old Hugh Adam.

We have already seen Regan appoint one man with strong connections to the Celtic boardrom to his so-called Independent Panel into Craig Whyte.

Regan should know that I am not the only old hack watching this with interest and following any connection which may lead back to his SFA boardroom pal, Celtic chief executive and SFA director, Peter Lawwell.

Further allegations of previous business links with Lawwell are being investigated at the moment.

Trouble may be brewing.

.............
FINALLY..........

THE bumbling imprecise Odious Creep is about to add another subject to the wide range he pontificates on without having any knowledge of.

He is, he tells us, busy writing a script for the BBC about ethical banking.

OH, REALLY!
Let’s hope he knows more about that than he does about 20[SUP]th[/SUP] Century history.

It is interesting to unmask the man at BBC Scotland who appears so in love with Odious Creep that keeps hiring this self confessed *****phile sympathiser to pollute the airwaves of the licence fee paid to BBC Radio Scotland.

His name is Jeff Zycinski. More on him at a later date. For the moment, if you are a licence fee payer and you object to having a self confessed *****phile sympathiser paid for from the public purse, then the head of BBC Radio Scotland, JEFF ZYCINSKI, is the man to write to.

Click to expand...

Hardly a word about Hugh Adam except some maybe/if whataboutery on Lawell.

Cossy · Mar 4, 2012

"Sooner or later that question will be answered and the organisations who consider Craig Whyte to be a person who interests them, will or will not make a move against him, depending on what evidence, photographic , documentary and otherwise, they compile."

What a complete gibbering bawbag.

DevAdvocate · Mar 4, 2012

[h=2]Sunday, 4 March 2012[/h][h=3]DONALD MUIR AND A CONFLICT OF INTERESTS- Exclusive[/h]
THE list of people with questions to answer about the part they have played in the WHYTE SCANDAL is almost endless.

Some of these folk may believe that, given the complexity of the WHYTE SCANDAL and the trail of debts and missing money left behind by Craig Whyte, they will slip under the radar and escape attention.

They are wrong!

For instance, we have not heard much in recent days or weeks of Donald Muir. Or about his whereabouts. Or what is he doing these days.

Is he working in some capacity for the Murray Group? Or is he employed at a lavish fee on a consultancy basis by Lloyds Bank, who have only been kept afloat by a 43 per cent stake of public money?

Time will reveal all about what he has been doing since he played such a central role in the forcing of David Murray to sell Rangers to trickster, Craig Whyte.

Trust me, it will!

Just about the only thing we do know about Donald Muir is that he is no longer a director of Rangers and that he ceased to have a seat at the Ibrox boardroom table as soon as Whyte pulled up his chair at the head of that table.

The two directors who appeared at odds with chairman Alastair Johnston and Paul Murray over whether or not the Whyte takeover of Rangers was a good thing for the club or not, were Donald Muir and Mike McGill.

McGill and Muir backed Craig Whyte while Johnston and Paul Murray issued dire warnings of the danger he posed to Rangers. I won’t insult you’re intelligence by asking you who was correct.

At the time, McGill’s presence on the board at Ibrox was said to be to represent the Murray Group interests, after owner David had been ordered to step down from the board by Lloyds.

Donald Muir, we were told, was there to represent the interests of Lloyds Bank. And that is something he most certainly did.

But did he represent the interests of the 26,000 small shareholders of Rangers, as it was his legal duty as a Rangers director?

Well, if he pushed for the Murray shareholding to be sold to Craig Whyte, many may believe he most certainly did not.

Perhaps that leaves him open to some sort of charge and no doubt when the mess is finally cleared up and when an Emergency General Meeting is called, Donald Muir’s shadowy part in the whole affair will be discussed, with the shareholders then given the opportunity to decide whether or not Donald Muir’s alleged culpability should be tested in a court of law.

Muir, according to my information, has never worked for either the Murray Group or Lloyds as a member of either organisation’s staff. Donald Muir, I believe, is a consultant. He works for himself, taking on consultancy contracts from whoever. A sort of hired gun, if you like.

He is said to have been employed as a consultant at one time by David Murray. He is also said to have been employed at one time by Lloyds Bank. And he was also, of course, a director of Rangers.

Murray, Lloyds and Rangers. Are you getting the picture? What it may paint to some people is a clear and obvious conflict of interest.

Yet when Paul Clarke from administrators Duff and Phelps tried to sneak Whyte’s old business buddy from the Rangers takeover days, David Grier, who also works for Duff and Phelps, in to see David Murray last week, they were joined only by Mike McGill. There was no sign of Donald Muir.

WHY?

There are others whose names have slipped out of public view in recent days and weeks as more pressing matters have closed in and as the WHYTE SCANDAL has continued to play itself out in a daily diet of dodgy deals and missing money.

They need not think they have gotten away with it. When the time comes they too will be named and placed under forensic examination, perhaps even by a top QC when under oath.

For the moment, though, let's content ourselves with Donald Muir and speculate on how he may react when questioned under oath about how, as a Rangers director, he discharged his legal duties to the 26,000 small shareholders.

Click to expand...

How many scapegoats is that has Leggo identified now? Must be getting into double figures by now.

Go Go Yellowscreen · Mar 4, 2012

McGill and Muir backed Craig Whyte while Johnston and Paul Murray issued dire warnings of the danger he posed to Rangers. I won’t insult youâre intelligence by asking you who was correct.

But isn't this the same Mr Leggat who backed Craig Whyte 100% at the time and said he would prove all the doubters wrong? That would mean he was as culpable as Muir. And he must have disagreed with his new hero Paul Murray.

DevAdvocate · Mar 4, 2012

Go Go Yellowscreen said: ↑

McGill and Muir backed Craig Whyte while Johnston and Paul Murray issued dire warnings of the danger he posed to Rangers. I won’t insult you’re intelligence by asking you who was correct.

But isn't this the same Mr Leggat who backed Craig Whyte 100% at the time and said he would prove all the doubters wrong? That would mean he was as culpable as Muir. And he must have disagreed with his new hero Paul Murray.
Click to expand...

Leggo has foolishly hitched his star to Paul Murray - who if I am not mistaken was part of the old board. It seems to me that as part of that board he would also have difficulty convincing the SFA that he is a fit and proper person to run a Football club.

EspaniaCelt · Mar 4, 2012

DevAdvocate said: ↑

How many scapegoats is that has Leggo identified now? Must be getting into double figures by now.
Click to expand...

With his 'shotgun' approach I suppose he's bound to hit something spot on, sooner or later.

Jimmy Savile · Mar 5, 2012

Monday, 5 March 2012
RANGERS COULD BE RESCUED BY SCOTS LAW - Exclusive

RANGERS may have found the way to make Craig Whyte responsible for the Â£24.4m he wheedled from Ticketus against future sales of Ibrox season tickets.

And the legal loophole seems to be because controversial law firm’s Collyer Bristow partner, Gary Withey, may not have been aware of differences in company law between Scotland and England.

However, amazingly Withey now appears to have gone into hiding. And Collyer Bristow appear to be saying that Withey's role as Rangers company secretary is nothing to do with them.

That is a matter for the authorities to decide on, but Collyer Bristow are already on the back foot as they await the verdict on a Â£50m action brought against them by angry investors.

Regular readers may recall that last week I revealed that lawyers were poring over all the fine print details in the deal which saw conman Whyte buy Rangers for a quid.

Now I have been told by a senior legal authority that the loophole is in Scottish company law regarding the Financial Assistance process which Whyte used to raise that Â£24.4m.

Of course, when M’Learned friends are involved we get bogged down in legalese which confounds the layman. So, for everybody’s benefit, especially mine, I’ll keep it simple, as it was explained to me.

It has all got something to do with a private company and individual rights. My legal contact says that means Whyte could not sell future season tickets without the consent of the season tickets holders.

For the deal to have been legal, he would have had to contact almost 40,000 Ibrox season ticket holders, explain what he proposed to do….and then get written permission from them all.

Only the ones who said “yes” could legally have had their future season tickets mortgaged.

It is also understood that Ticketus have now been told by their English lawyers, who have studied Scots Law, that Financial Assistance should not have been allowed, as Whyte did not have the necessary legal permission from the season ticket holders to mortgage their season tickets.

The bottom line therefore is, again according to a top legal expert in this field, that if Ticketus want their money back then they will have to chap on Craig Whyte’s door to get it.

Or cut a deal to work with Rangers in the future, based on goodwill and trust, things that Paul Murray can offer, but two qualities Whyte has never heard of, far less has.

There are of course other debts which Rangers have been landed with from the carnage wreaked upon them by the WHYTE SCANDA and I will address them later this week.

One word which will recur when I turn my attention to these debts will be, HONOUR!

Something else Craig Whyte has no knowledge of.
…….
AND
………

SOMETIMES the blindingly obvious can escape you. It can take a wee while for the penny to drop.

Thus has it been with the excellent and in depth interview given to veteran reporter, Ron Scott of the Sunday Post eight days ago by “Sir” Walter Smith.

The Ibrox icon spoke about his regret at the position Alastair McCoist has been placed in during his first season as manager and how he, Smith, would never have left had he known things were going to turn out this way.

It took a Paul Murray associate to make the point to me yesterday that when you think about it, Alastair McCoist is indeed, the Lone Ranger. The only man inside the club who speaks for Rangers.

Thankfully for the legions of Rangers supporters who are worrying about their club’s future future, that task could hardly have fallen on the shoulders of a better, bigger, braver and wiser man.

“Sir “ Walter apart, which of course goes without saying.

Seriously, Alastair McCoist has risen to the task magnificently and his after-the-match address to the media on Saturday was both pointed and timely. It was also very “Coisty.”

Some folk I have spoken to believe his well worded warning was aimed at Neil Lennon, who has had far too much to say about Rangers. Personally – and I stress this is merely my view – I think he was taking aim further up the chain of command.

And not just at those inside Parkhead who are trying to put together some sort of Scottish Premier League Celtic cabal, aimed at inflicting long term damage on Rangers.

My thoughts appear to have been given extra credence by the Sunday’s Mail’s exclusive story by the always well informed on Celtic matters, Mark Guidi.

He revealed that if Rangers are still in administration when the new season starts, there are moves – which I believe are inspired by that man with a finger in so many pies, Peter Lawwell – to inflict MORE than a ten point penalty on Rangers and to also punish them financially by withholding SPL, sponsorship and Sky money.

That seemed to be the gist of Mark’s top notch exclusive.

As I have frequently pointed out, those who I have been told it is believed Lawwell has taken into the Parkhead tent, include Rod Petrie of Hibs, Stephen Thompson of Dundee United and their ally at Aberdeen, managing director and a man seemingly in thrall to all things Celtic, Duncan Fraser.

As was the case with “Sir” Walter, Alastair often seems to know what’s going to happen before it does, as he has a grapevine which hums and whistles.

He knows who are trying to take advantage of Rangers being on the deck, to do more than just administer a good kicking, but to actually strangle the life out of the venerable Ibrox club.

Alastair McCoist is the man who speaks for Rangers. It is as well for the club that this great Ranger is up to the task.

Click to expand...

Siding with that wee ****e that couldn't manage a nursery just because he says what the people wish to hear?

Wee turncoat bastard won't even tell his charges they're sacked - what a coward - that's the kind of nitty gritty I never shy from.

Also, what I have undertaken at Rangers is a plan to rescue the club - not a "scanda", whatever that is.

This plook needs to remember the grade of poker I play and the last person to see my cards would be some drunken blogger.

If he worked for me, I'd sack this man.

...after I'd pocketed his PAYE.

Go Go Yellowscreen · Mar 5, 2012

Exclusive? Could have sworn I read this in the papers last week.

Also, if Colyster Bristow lose the Â£50m action brought against them they will go out of business meaning the Huns wont get any more money out of them.

Bib Fortuna's Maw · Mar 5, 2012

Seriously, Alastair McCoist has risen to the task magnificently and his after-the-match address to the media on Saturday was both pointed and timely. It was also very “Coisty.”
Click to expand...

Translation: "He can lose as many games as he wants, as long as he talks pish about Timmy, we'll love him without reserve."

I want to keep kicking

Cossy · Mar 5, 2012

Didn't the previous rangers board have a selling future season tickets arrangement? Did they get the go-ahead from all the ticket holders?

bolloxpants · Mar 5, 2012

The fact that the Leg places so much trust in McMoist is reason to doubt his sanity. The fact he keeps slinging the same pi$h at Spiers is just worrying, he will get into bother. I think he will end up tagged, hopefully it will not affect his internet useage.

Go G YellowScreen · Mar 5, 2012

Having the backing of Leggo is the kiss of death!

bolloxpants · Mar 5, 2012

Yes indeed he is the 'black spot' , I think it's only a matter of time "Odious Creep" wins the lottery)

DevAdvocate · Mar 5, 2012

Cossy said: ↑

Didn't the previous rangers board have a selling future season tickets arrangement? Did they get the go-ahead from all the ticket holders?
Click to expand...

Surely you are not suggesting that Leggo is talking a load of ****e?

The downfall of the house of Leggo

Cossy Well-Known Member

Go G YellowScreen Well-Known Member

AP: Password Mong Well-Known Member

rogueleader suave gringo

Go G YellowScreen Well-Known Member

VenomPD Merrick jr

DevAdvocate Gigging bassist

Cossy Well-Known Member

DevAdvocate Gigging bassist

Go Go Yellowscreen Member

DevAdvocate Gigging bassist

EspaniaCelt Well-Known Member

Jimmy Savile New Member

Go Go Yellowscreen Member

Bib Fortuna's Maw Well-Known Member

Cossy Well-Known Member

bolloxpants Member

Go G YellowScreen Well-Known Member

bolloxpants Member

DevAdvocate Gigging bassist

Share This Page

About Us

Quick Navigation

Like us on Facebook

Buy us a beer!

Useful Searches

The downfall of the house of Leggo

Cossy Well-Known Member

Go G YellowScreen Well-Known Member

AP: Password Mong Well-Known Member

rogueleader suave gringo

Go G YellowScreen Well-Known Member

VenomPD Merrick jr

DevAdvocate Gigging bassist

Cossy Well-Known Member

DevAdvocate Gigging bassist

Go Go Yellowscreen Member

DevAdvocate Gigging bassist

EspaniaCelt Well-Known Member

Jimmy Savile New Member

Go Go Yellowscreen Member

Bib Fortuna's Maw Well-Known Member

Cossy Well-Known Member

bolloxpants Member

Go G YellowScreen Well-Known Member

bolloxpants Member

DevAdvocate Gigging bassist

Share This Page